Post by DarylPost by NoddyWhile you're at it, take a moment to explain how, if licensing systems
make it possible to weed out the shonks and leave only the expert
tradespeople in the system, someone who can't tell the difference
between plastic and glass could be considered "competent" and *not*
removed from the quality work pool?
In your own time will be fine....
Only reason I can think of to agree with him is that it could make it
illegal for unqualified people to work on their own cars, I always
thought it odd that there is nothing to stop a plumber or an electrician
working on their cars brakes or steering etc yet a mechanic isn't
allowed to do plumbing or wiring.
It doesn't make it illegal to work on your own vehicles, and as far as
I'm aware there are no laws anywhere in the country that prevent anyone
from ever doing so. All a mechanic's license does is make it illegal to
work in the trade professionally without one.
It's like having a red union card. You can be as qualified and
experienced as you like, but you can't get on the job site and earn a
living unless you have the card. Having one doesn't make you any good.
It just means you have the right to work.
Post by DarylOf course Felix wouldn't like it because the cost of car repairs would
go up significantly if mechanics was a closed trade like plumbing etc,
I'd be very happy to hang my qualifications on the wall then charge
people like Felix $350.00 an hour to work on their cars:-)
It may do.
I don't know if it's made any significant difference to the cost of
repair work in WA/NSW compared to here. I think the point is more one of
it not having shown to make any appreciable difference to *anything*.
A couple of posts ago I asked Felix to demonstrate how the licensing
systems have made difference to the quality of work in WA & NSW compared
to other states where no such licensing system exists and he hasn't come
back with anything which I can only conclude means that despite the
noise he's made on the subject he's not been able to find anything
credible to support his ignorant bias :)
Post by DarylAgree there is bugger all reason to think that standards would improve
if mechanics were licensed, licensing is more about the power of unions
in various trades rather than standards.
Government revenue raising has a lot to do with it, but there is also a
case to be made where governments introduce policies to placate the
public by being *seen* to be doing something regardless of how effective
(or not) that something may be.
Take the licensing system in Western Australia for example.
Post by Darylhttps://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/consumer-protection/motor-vehicle-repairers-certificate
The only requirement for someone who holds an existing trade
qualification to obtain a license in WA is for one to fill in the
relevant form, provide a photo ID, a current police check and pay the
appropriate fee. Anyone holding any automotive trade qualification from
Australia, New Zealand or any other recognised country needs to do
nothing more than that, and in fact the license is no more difficult to
obtain that it is to get a "working with children" certificate to become
a teacher's aid in a Primary school.
You do not have your skills assessed, Despite the chest beating noise
made by the resident clog wearing circus freak the last time this
bullshit came up in conversation. The *only* time such assessments are
necessary are if you hold qualifications from countries that aren't
formally recognised, or you have experience without formal qualification.
It's as simple as that, and in the case of existing qualified applicants
were no assessment is ever made, how anyone thinks obtaining a license
makles the *slightest* bit of difference where "weeds out the shonks" is
concerned is a total mystery :)
Post by DarylIn other parts of the world such as the UK or the US its considered
normal for people do their own house wiring yet its illegal here.
That's because this country has been overrun by bureaucratic namby-pamby
hand holders.
--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.