OT: Fraudster, Could You Please Clarify?

[Fred]

Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang' lie
in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only child...".
This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling and discovered
this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.

"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same task
will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."

Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.

1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)

2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall hearing
about your daughter other than the above)

3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain how
it was posted on 16Jan01?

So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?

TIA



alvey
(a) I've posted the beginning of this quote before (2021), but of course
you failed to respond.

[Xeno]

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang' lie
in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only child...".
This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling and discovered
this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same task
will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall hearing
about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain how
it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

It's getting more and more difficult to sift the truth out from between
the lies he tells - the truth being such a tiny percentage of the total.

Post by Fred
alvey
(a) I've posted the beginning of this quote before (2021), but of course
you failed to respond.

Naturally!

[Clocky]

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang' lie
in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only child...".
This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling and discovered
this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same task
will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall hearing
about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain how
it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

Post by Fred
alvey
(a) I've posted the beginning of this quote before (2021), but of course
you failed to respond.

[Xeno]

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same task
will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

Maybe the fraud should ask his wife how many kids he has, she should
know. When you're forgetting how many kids you have, it could well be
dementia setting in. Would explain, to an extent, his delusions.

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
alvey
(a) I've posted the beginning of this quote before (2021), but of
course you failed to respond.

[alvey]

Post by Xeno

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same
task will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

Maybe the fraud should ask his wife how many kids he has, she should
know. When you're forgetting how many kids you have, it could well be
dementia setting in. Would explain, to an extent, his delusions.

Dementia makes people forget things, not invent them. Have another look
at the date posted...



alvey

[Clocky]

Post by Xeno

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same
task will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

Maybe the fraud should ask his wife how many kids he has, she should
know. When you're forgetting how many kids you have, it could well be
dementia setting in. Would explain, to an extent, his delusions.

Look at the date he posted that though...

[Jimmy]

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same task
will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

Superficially, it certainly looks bad for Fraudster, but I'm certain
that he'll be along any minute to sort it out.



alvey

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same
task will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
alvey
(a) I've posted the beginning of this quote before (2021), but of
course you failed to respond.

[alvey]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same
task will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

The only thing that's practically *impossible* to find in a Fraudster
claim is Truth.

That aside, given the date of his claim, he could have lost two. Luckily
Fraudster will be along shortly to resolve this anomaly.



alvey



alvey

[Clocky]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same
task will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting something
along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another kid and him
saying that she could have it only if she looked after it or words along
those lines. That would have been the last one then.

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they
will be fully aware of the difference between right and wrong.
Hopefully, the people within the education system who are charged
with that same task will also strive to ensure that not only my
children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting something
along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another kid and him
saying that she could have it only if she looked after it or words
along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this. I know he says he doesn't care what
anyone has to say about him, or calls him, but the personal life, and
especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's business but their
own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to the purpose of this forum.

[Clocky]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they
will be fully aware of the difference between right and wrong.
Hopefully, the people within the education system who are charged
with that same task will also strive to ensure that not only my
children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting something
along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another kid and him
saying that she could have it only if she looked after it or words
along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this. I know he says he doesn't care what
anyone has to say about him, or calls him, but the personal life, and
especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's business but their
own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to the purpose of this forum.

They were always irrelevant to this forum and such discussion should bot
have been made public by him.

But it's a fair enough stance on reflection and I'm not going to trawl
through posts to find it so I'll retract my comment and apologise for
bringing it up.

[Clocky]

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an
only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another kid
and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after it or
words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this. I know he says he doesn't care
what anyone has to say about him, or calls him, but the personal life,
and especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's business but
their own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to the purpose of
this forum.

They were always irrelevant to this forum and such discussion should bot
have been made public by him.
But it's a fair enough stance on reflection and I'm not going to trawl
through posts to find it so I'll retract my comment and apologise for
bringing it up.

btw some of his vile and disgusting comments relating to other peoples
family members haven't been forgotten, so he brings it upon himself and
can't play the moral high ground card here if he tries that.

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Clocky

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went
off a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous
lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this. I know he says he doesn't care
what anyone has to say about him, or calls him, but the personal
life, and especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's
business but their own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to
the purpose of this forum.

They were always irrelevant to this forum and such discussion should
bot have been made public by him.
But it's a fair enough stance on reflection and I'm not going to
trawl through posts to find it so I'll retract my comment and
apologise for bringing it up.

btw some of his vile and disgusting comments relating to other peoples
family members haven't been forgotten, so he brings it upon himself
and can't play the moral high ground card here if he tries that.

exactly

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this. I know he says he doesn't care
what anyone has to say about him, or calls him, but the personal
life, and especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's
business but their own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to
the purpose of this forum.

They were always irrelevant to this forum and such discussion should
bot have been made public by him.
But it's a fair enough stance on reflection and I'm not going to trawl
through posts to find it so I'll retract my comment and apologise for
bringing it up.

it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something publicly
then they should know it can be commented on. but then to start deviling
into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

[Clocky]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this. I know he says he doesn't care
what anyone has to say about him, or calls him, but the personal
life, and especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's
business but their own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to
the purpose of this forum.

They were always irrelevant to this forum and such discussion should
bot have been made public by him.
But it's a fair enough stance on reflection and I'm not going to trawl
through posts to find it so I'll retract my comment and apologise for
bringing it up.

it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something publicly
then they should know it can be commented on. but then to start deviling
into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well he's opened himself up for that due to his own behaviour in here of
course, let's not forget that.

[Keithr0]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this. I know he says he doesn't care
what anyone has to say about him, or calls him, but the personal
life, and especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's
business but their own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to
the purpose of this forum.

They were always irrelevant to this forum and such discussion should
bot have been made public by him.
But it's a fair enough stance on reflection and I'm not going to trawl
through posts to find it so I'll retract my comment and apologise for
bringing it up.

it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something publicly
then they should know it can be commented on. but then to start deviling
into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

[Noddy]

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something publicly
then they should know it can be commented on. but then to start
deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post into a
newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it and the other
half dozen or so people couldn't care less either way. Just my opinion,
but the juice doesn't seem to be worth anything like the squeeze there.

I'll bet he's fun at parties....

[alvey]

Post by Noddy

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something publicly
then they should know it can be commented on. but then to start
deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post into a
newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it and the other
half dozen or so people couldn't care less either way. Just my opinion,
but the juice doesn't seem to be worth anything like the squeeze there.
I'll bet he's fun at parties....

yeah yeah. The usual slops bucket of lies, desperate attempts to divert
and inept stabs at insults. Borr ing... It's no challenge anymore
Fraudster, so I'll ignore this typical Gibbenish rubbish and fast
forward straight to The Big Issue; How about you answer the questions
Fraudster.




alvey

[Xeno]

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something
publicly then they should know it can be commented on. but then to
start deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post into
a newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it and the
other half dozen or so people couldn't care less either way. Just my
opinion, but the juice doesn't seem to be worth anything like the
squeeze there.
I'll bet he's fun at parties....

yeah yeah. The usual slops bucket of lies, desperate attempts to divert
and inept stabs at insults. Borr ing... It's no challenge anymore
Fraudster, so I'll ignore this typical  Gibbenish rubbish and fast
forward straight to The Big Issue; How about you answer the questions
Fraudster.
alvey

I hear the rapid patter of footsteps receding off into the distance!

[Xeno]

Post by Noddy

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something publicly
then they should know it can be commented on. but then to start
deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post into a
newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it and the other
half dozen or so people couldn't care less either way. Just my opinion,
but the juice doesn't seem to be worth anything like the squeeze there.
I'll bet he's fun at parties....

I'll bet you're the *death* of parties as you blast people with your
bullshit spiels and self aggrandising lies!

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something
publicly then they should know it can be commented on. but then to
start deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post into
a newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it and the
other half dozen or so people couldn't care less either way. Just my
opinion, but the juice doesn't seem to be worth anything like the
squeeze there.
I'll bet he's fun at parties....

I'll bet you're the *death* of parties as you blast people with your
bullshit spiels and self aggrandising lies!

he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

[Xeno]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something
publicly then they should know it can be commented on. but then to
start deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post into
a newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it and the
other half dozen or so people couldn't care less either way. Just my
opinion, but the juice doesn't seem to be worth anything like the
squeeze there.
I'll bet he's fun at parties....

I'll bet you're the *death* of parties as you blast people with your
bullshit spiels and self aggrandising lies!

he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

Point!

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse
he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

You know Felix, it's pretty clear why you have this adoration for the
mental case. He's the Donald Trump of aus.cars

He lives in a totally delusional world, talks nothing but utter shit,
completely ignores fact checking of any kind, and knows that his rusted
on supporters (that'd be you) will believe anything he says regardless
whether it's true or not.

I wonder if he also paints himself orange?

[Clocky]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

You know Felix, it's pretty clear why you have this adoration for the
mental case. He's the Donald Trump of aus.cars
He lives in a totally delusional world, talks nothing but utter shit,
completely ignores fact checking of any kind, and knows that his rusted
on supporters (that'd be you) will believe anything he says regardless
whether it's true or not.
I wonder if he also paints himself orange?

There is no evidence felix is one of your rusted on supporters.

[Xeno]

Post by Clocky

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

You know Felix, it's pretty clear why you have this adoration for the
mental case. He's the Donald Trump of aus.cars
He lives in a totally delusional world, talks nothing but utter shit,
completely ignores fact checking of any kind, and knows that his
rusted on supporters (that'd be you) will believe anything he says
regardless whether it's true or not.
I wonder if he also paints himself orange?

There is no evidence felix is one of your rusted on supporters.

Yeah, offering to weld up Felix' rusted up exhaust doesn't count!

[Xeno]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

You know Felix, it's pretty clear why you have this adoration for the
mental case. He's the Donald Trump of aus.cars
He lives in a totally delusional world, talks nothing but utter shit,

Who was it who *invented* their three (3) apprenticeships Darren? You
puir wee bastard, you couldn't even *achieve* in high school, you
couldn't even *qualify* to sign on to any apprenticeship ever, so, in
your delusional mind, you *compensate* for your failures, actually you
*overcompensate*, and *invent shit*!

Post by Noddy
completely ignores fact checking of any kind, and knows that his rusted

Fact checking? If you had done some *fact checking*, you would have
realised that it was impossible to sign on to *aviation apprenticeships*
with even year 9 passes, something you didn't even manage to achieve.
Did you really work at an airport Darren? Did you mingle with *real
apprentices* there? Didn't you ever think to ask just how many years
they had at *TAFE*. 4 years Darren, not 3 as you incorrectly thought,
and was proven by a government document your mate Daryl dredged up.
Ironic, what he thought was going to cripple me actually resulted in him
crippling *your delusions*. I seriously think even *working* at the
airport *as a TA* was one of your delusions. If you did, it definitely
wasn't as an apprentice AME.

Actually, your greatest delusion was thinking you could get away with
falsely claiming another apprenticeship - as a motor mechanic. Special
dispensation from the DLI, how I laughed when you came up with that load
of bullshit. You see, the problem for you was that I worked in TAFE and
*trained apprentices*. As such, we in TAFE never ever dealt with the DLI
as training was definitely not in their remit. We dealt with, at that
time, the Industrial Training Commission (ITC). It's all in the name
Darren. "Training", that's what an apprenticeship is all about - and you
missed out. Of course, even two apprenticeships wasn't enough, so you
claimed yet another! You screwed up there with the facts by simply being
ignorant of the fact that *all auto machining apprentices* in Victoria
were *directed* by the *ITC* to attend the auto machining training
centre at Richmond TAFE. No Darren, they didn't volunteer to attend
Richmond, they were *told* to attend, no other option was available to
them at that time. So your claim to have done your auto machining
training *in-house* at Repco was just more delusional bullshit from you!

You would have been smart to stop at one delusional claim, but you
couldn't do that, your narcissism combined with your insecurity complex
wouldn't allow it. So one delusional apprenticeship claim became two and
then three. At first I didn't question your AME apprenticeship, I had no
reason to since I wasn't an AME. I really didn't question your auto
machining claim either - at first. It was when you claimed to have done
a motor mechanic's apprenticeship after *transferring* from an AME
apprenticeship, that's when I smelt bullshit in the air. Then you
elaborated with *more delusions*, the requirement to spend a year in a
servo, the granting of special dispensation from the DLI and the fact
that you had no clue what *recognition of prior learning (RPL)* was all
about and that it involved a complex and involved assessment process.
You thought it was an *exam* that your kid sister could pass. Sadly, for
you, that is not and never was the case. So I kept throwing little
titbits (some would call them baits) your way. As expected, you piled on
more and more bullshit - and got caught up in your own lies. That was
when I called into question both your other delusional claims, your AME
apprenticeship and your auto machining apprenticeship. As expected, they
fell by the wayside when put under scrutiny too.
The best though was that phone call I made to VetAssess, seems your name
doesn't even exist *anywhere* in the trade registration database. That
one little fact put the kibosh on all your delusional claims. You poor
simple bastard, you didn't even know that every tradesman in *Australia*
has a *uniquely numbered trade certificate*, one for every trade they
have. You couldn't know that, you'd never seen a trade certificate in
your life, much less been awarded one.

Post by Noddy
on supporters (that'd be you) will believe anything he says regardless
whether it's true or not.

You long ago lost the ability to differentiate between truth or lie.

Post by Noddy
I wonder if he also paints himself orange?

You painted a bullseye on yourself the day you started making delusional
claims! Now you keep quiet on trade papers, just harping on about
*experience*. If you had done an apprenticeship, you would have known
that an apprenticeship is training followed by experience. The only
thing you have *experience in - projection! Oh, and running away,
sniping as you go. That's cowardly.

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

You know Felix, it's pretty clear why you have this adoration for the
mental case. He's the Donald Trump of aus.cars
He lives in a totally delusional world, talks nothing but utter shit,

Who was it who *invented* their three (3) apprenticeships Darren? You
puir wee bastard, you couldn't even *achieve* in high school, you
couldn't even *qualify* to sign on to any apprenticeship ever, so, in
your delusional mind, you *compensate* for your failures, actually you
*overcompensate*, and *invent shit*!

he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my business
was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit', if anyone
disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy
completely ignores fact checking of any kind, and knows that his rusted

Fact checking? If you had done some *fact checking*, you would have
realised that it was impossible to sign on to *aviation
apprenticeships* with even year 9 passes, something you didn't even
manage to achieve. Did you really work at an airport Darren? Did you
mingle with *real apprentices* there? Didn't you ever think to ask
just how many years they had at *TAFE*. 4 years Darren, not 3 as you
incorrectly thought, and was proven by a government document your mate
Daryl dredged up. Ironic, what he thought was going to cripple me
actually resulted in him crippling *your delusions*. I seriously think
even *working* at the airport *as a TA* was one of your delusions. If
you did, it definitely wasn't as an apprentice AME.
Actually, your greatest delusion was thinking you could get away with
falsely claiming another apprenticeship - as a motor mechanic. Special
dispensation from the DLI, how I laughed when you came up with that
load of bullshit. You see, the problem for you was that I worked in
TAFE and *trained apprentices*. As such, we in TAFE never ever dealt
with the DLI as training was definitely not in their remit. We dealt
with, at that time, the Industrial Training Commission (ITC). It's all
in the name Darren. "Training", that's what an apprenticeship is all
about - and you missed out. Of course, even two apprenticeships wasn't
enough, so you claimed yet another! You screwed up there with the
facts by simply being ignorant of the fact that *all auto machining
apprentices* in Victoria were *directed* by the *ITC* to attend the
auto machining training centre at Richmond TAFE. No Darren, they
didn't volunteer to attend Richmond, they were *told* to attend, no
other option was available to them at that time. So your claim to have
done your auto machining training *in-house* at Repco was just more
delusional bullshit from you!
You would have been smart to stop at one delusional claim, but you
couldn't do that, your narcissism combined with your insecurity
complex wouldn't allow it. So one delusional apprenticeship claim
became two and then three. At first I didn't question your AME
apprenticeship, I had no reason to since I wasn't an AME. I really
didn't question your auto machining claim either - at first. It was
when you claimed to have done a motor mechanic's apprenticeship after
*transferring* from an AME apprenticeship, that's when I smelt
bullshit in the air. Then you elaborated with *more delusions*, the
requirement to spend a year in a servo, the granting of special
dispensation from the DLI and the fact that you had no clue what
*recognition of prior learning (RPL)* was all about and that it
involved a complex and involved assessment process. You thought it was
an *exam* that your kid sister could pass. Sadly, for you, that is not
and never was the case. So I kept throwing little titbits (some would
call them baits) your way. As expected, you piled on more and more
bullshit - and got caught up in your own lies. That was when I called
into question both your other delusional claims, your AME
apprenticeship and your auto machining apprenticeship. As expected,
they fell by the wayside when put under scrutiny too.
The best though was that phone call I made to VetAssess, seems your
name doesn't even exist *anywhere* in the trade registration database.
That one little fact put the kibosh on all your delusional claims. You
poor simple bastard, you didn't even know that every tradesman in
*Australia* has a *uniquely numbered trade certificate*, one for every
trade they have. You couldn't know that, you'd never seen a trade
certificate in your life, much less been awarded one.

if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims, or
any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy
on supporters (that'd be you) will believe anything he says
regardless whether it's true or not.

he assumes of course. he has no way of knowing what I believe or not
unless I make some comment

Post by Xeno
You long ago lost the ability to differentiate between truth or lie.

Post by Noddy
I wonder if he also paints himself orange?

You painted a bullseye on yourself the day you started making
delusional claims! Now you keep quiet on trade papers, just harping on
about *experience*. If you had done an apprenticeship, you would have
known that an apprenticeship is training followed by experience. The
only thing you have *experience in - projection! Oh, and running away,
sniping as you go. That's cowardly.

90% of what he says about myself and others is projection!

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my business
was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit', if anyone
disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)

This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims, or
any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no idea
why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of fucked
up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to meet
someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

Of course, as usual; the irony here is lost on you. Once again you jump
up and down about "proof" but ignore the elephant in the room who has
not proved a single thing despite making more claims in this group than
all other regulars combined :)

Post by Mighty Mouse
he assumes of course. he has no way of knowing what I believe or not
unless I make some comment
90% of what he says about myself and others is projection!

Is it really, Felix? Do you even understand what "projection" in this
instance actually means? I'm tipping not.

[Xeno]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager

They were, supposedly, *on your desk* in *your office*. That is, they
were until you were asked to *prove it*. Then they mysteriously
disappeared from view never to be seen again.

Post by Noddy
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no idea
why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of fucked

Seeing *genuine* motor mechanic's qualifications would be a *first* for
you, for Daryl, not so much. You've only ever *imagined* what they look
like lacking any *real world experience* in possessing such.

Post by Noddy
up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to meet
someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

But then, when a lying tool *boasts* about having papers, the
situation's changed.

Post by Noddy
Of course, as usual; the irony here is lost on you. Once again you jump
up and down about "proof" but ignore the elephant in the room who has
not proved a single thing despite making more claims in this group than
all other regulars combined :)

Post by Mighty Mouse
he assumes of course. he has no way of knowing what I believe or not
unless I make some comment
90% of what he says about myself and others is projection!

Is it really, Felix? Do you even understand what "projection" in this
instance actually means? I'm tipping not.

You do it 90% of the time. Actually, I'd be betting on a higher percentage.

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've
ever made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very*
big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager

They were, supposedly, *on your desk* in *your office*. That is, they
were until you were asked to *prove it*. Then they mysteriously
disappeared from view never to be seen again.

isn't it strange that when the matter of qualifications arose, his best
mate didn't take the trouble to sight and confirm them during one of the
times he visited, and then state here that he had to put an end to any
doubt? assuming he would have visited often since they're best mates.
and especially since they were sitting in 'plain sight on his desk'. but
then of course one wonders why qualifications would be 'sitting on a
desk', and not in a filing cabinet, or on the wall of the office or
study as mine are.

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no
idea why either of us would ever *want* to.

but probably/possibly he would have mentioned/discussed with his best
mate what each had done

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy
I don't know what kind of fucked

Seeing *genuine* motor mechanic's qualifications would be a *first*
for you, for Daryl, not so much. You've only ever *imagined* what they
look like lacking any *real world experience* in possessing such.

Post by Noddy
up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to meet
someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

But then, when a lying tool *boasts* about having papers, the
situation's changed.

Post by Noddy
Of course, as usual; the irony here is lost on you. Once again you
jump up and down about "proof" but ignore the elephant in the room
who has not proved a single thing despite making more claims in this
group than all other regulars combined :)

Post by Mighty Mouse
he assumes of course. he has no way of knowing what I believe or not
unless I make some comment
90% of what he says about myself and others is projection!

Is it really, Felix? Do you even understand what "projection" in this
instance actually means? I'm tipping not.

You do it 90% of the time. Actually, I'd be betting on a higher percentage.

thought you might :)

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

you misunderstood. I was talking about any comments I make, not
specifically those.

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him.

so you've never talked about your time there with him?

Post by Noddy
I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications and he's never asked to
see mine, and to be quite honest I have no idea why either of us would
ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of fucked up world you live in,
but I certainly don't extend my hand to meet someone and then ask to
see "zer Papars".
Of course, as usual; the irony here is lost on you. Once again you
jump up and down about "proof" but ignore the elephant in the room who
has not proved a single thing despite making more claims in this group
than all other regulars combined :)

I'm pretty sure elephants can't post here..

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he assumes of course. he has no way of knowing what I believe or not
unless I make some comment
90% of what he says about myself and others is projection!

Is it really, Felix? Do you even understand what "projection" in this
instance actually means?

yep. it's even in this thread in the part you snipped; as you usually do
to destroy context, and remarks that prove you wrong, of course.

Post by Noddy
I'm tipping not.

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

you misunderstood. I was talking about any comments I make, not
specifically those.

I understood what you were saying just fine, Felix. In fact, it made me
think of a little test that could be put to you that most would no doubt
find to be amusing, which would be to randomly select comments you'd
made previously and repost them here as someone else. It wouldn't be at
all difficult to insert them here into any current conversation as you
never seem to travel far from the same basic thing every day.

It would most likely reveal two things: (a) You'd think the comments
were idiotic and the person making them a moron, and (b) you wouldn't
remember ever making them.

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him.

so you've never talked about your time there with him?

Other than here? no. Not that I can recall. He may remember better than
I, but I certainly don't remember ever talking about it anywhere other
than here. I don't think he would have an interest to be honest, just
like I'd never asked him much about his cleaning business. Other than if
he could recommend someone to clean my house :)

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
Of course, as usual; the irony here is lost on you. Once again you
jump up and down about "proof" but ignore the elephant in the room who
has not proved a single thing despite making more claims in this group
than all other regulars combined :)

I'm pretty sure elephants can't post here..

And I'm pretty sure you know exactly what I'm talking about but choose
to use infantile shit like this to avoid it.

As usual.

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
Is it really, Felix? Do you even understand what "projection" in this
instance actually means?

yep. it's even in this thread in the part you snipped; as you usually do
to destroy context, and remarks that prove you wrong, of course.

Again Felix I'm reminded of your complete inability to distinguish
between fact and opinion. Just like you're doing here, for example. Your
problem, as far as I can tell, is that you seem to be impressed by the
*volume* of comment directed at you rather than the *veracity* of it.
You make no attempt whatsoever to seek supporting evidence or even
question how the person making the comment would even be in a position
to know the things they claim to do.

Instead, you just absorb everything like a sponge and just assume
everything you're being told is factual simply because someone is going
to the trouble of telling you, and because you think "it makes sense".

You are ignorant, and you are gullible, and you insist that the
information fed to you is correct despite not a single word of it ever
having been shown to be true in the entire time you've been here.

Not *once*. Ever.

You can bang on about being "intelligent" and a "logical
conversationalist" until Mars is colonised Felix, but the evidence
supporting that is poor, and it remains opinion.

Not fact :)

[alvey]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've
ever made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very*
big call.

you misunderstood. I was talking about any comments I make, not
specifically those.

I understood what you were saying just fine, Felix. In fact, it made me
think of a little test that could be put to you that most would no doubt
find to be amusing, which would be to randomly select comments you'd
made previously and repost them here as someone else. It wouldn't be at
all difficult to insert them here into any current conversation as you
never seem to travel far from the same basic thing every day.
It would most likely reveal two things: (a) You'd think the comments
were idiotic and the person making them a moron, and (b) you wouldn't
remember ever making them.

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service
manager before I ever met him.

so you've never talked about your time there with him?

Other than here? no. Not that I can recall. He may remember better than
I, but I certainly don't remember ever talking about it anywhere other
than here. I don't think he would have an interest to be honest, just
like I'd never asked him much about his cleaning business. Other than if
he could recommend someone to clean my house :)

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
Of course, as usual; the irony here is lost on you. Once again you
jump up and down about "proof" but ignore the elephant in the room
who has not proved a single thing despite making more claims in this
group than all other regulars combined :)

I'm pretty sure elephants can't post here..

And I'm pretty sure you know exactly what I'm talking about but choose
to use infantile shit like this to avoid it.
As usual.

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
Is it really, Felix? Do you even understand what "projection" in this
instance actually means?

yep. it's even in this thread in the part you snipped; as you usually
do to destroy context, and remarks that prove you wrong, of course.

Again Felix I'm reminded of your complete inability to distinguish
between fact and opinion. Just like you're doing here, for example. Your
problem, as far as I can tell, is that you seem to be impressed by the
*volume* of comment directed at you rather than the *veracity* of it.
You make no attempt whatsoever to seek supporting evidence or even
question how the person making the comment would even be in a position
to know the things they claim to do.
Instead, you just absorb everything like a sponge and just assume
everything you're being told is factual simply because someone is going
to the trouble of telling you, and because you think "it makes sense".
You are ignorant, and you are gullible, and you insist that the
information fed to you is correct despite not a single word of it ever
having been shown to be true in the entire time you've been here.
Not *once*. Ever.
You can bang on about being "intelligent" and a "logical
conversationalist" until Mars is colonised Felix, but the evidence
supporting that is poor, and it remains opinion.
Not fact :)

Bravo Buffo! Fabulous effort!
I haven't laughed so hard since my first viewing of 'Holy Grail'.


alvey

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking
shit', if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to
dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've
ever made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very*
big call.

you misunderstood. I was talking about any comments I make, not
specifically those.

I understood what you were saying just fine, Felix.

no you didn't or you wouldn't have said what you did

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service
manager before I ever met him.

so you've never talked about your time there with him?

Other than here? no. Not that I can recall. He may remember better
than I, but I certainly don't remember ever talking about it anywhere
other than here. I don't think he would have an interest to be honest,
just like I'd never asked him much about his cleaning business. Other
than if he could recommend someone to clean my house :)

<snip noddy drivel>

[Daryl]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no idea
why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of fucked
up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to meet
someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications, I might have
been asked to show mine when I applied for the job at Ford but since
that was 47yrs ago in 1977 I can't remember if it was a requirement or not.
Just for Felix I don't need to see a piece of paper to know whether or
not you are a competent mechanic, its obvious that you know what you are
doing just by looking in your workshop and I deliberately used the term
competent rather than qualified because IMHO competence is far more
important than qualified.
Also for Felix I have been to the site of your Altona workshop, you were
out of it by the time we meet but the place was exactly as described.

[Xeno]

Post by Daryl

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no
idea why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of
fucked up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to
meet someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications, I might have
been asked to show mine when I applied for the job at Ford but since
that was 47yrs ago in 1977 I can't remember if it was a requirement or not.

Back in those days it was a requirement for actual documents, as opposed
to copies, for them to be physically sighted within governments and
large corporations. No different in 1980 when I applied for teaching and
at TAA or, prior to that, Inco (Indonesia), Mt Newman Mining, et al.

Post by Daryl
Just for Felix I don't need to see a piece of paper to know whether or
not you are a competent mechanic, its obvious that you know what you are

Les' engine would indicate otherwise. Not a good rap up for you either,
it has to be said. You, by your own admission, couldn't check those
rather critical piston to valve clearances.

Post by Daryl
doing just by looking in your workshop and I deliberately used the term
competent rather than qualified because IMHO competence is far more
important than qualified.

So you're conceding Darren isn't qualified. Thanks for that!

Post by Daryl
Also for Felix I have been to the site of your Altona workshop, you were
out of it by the time we meet but the place was exactly as described.

Hate to tell you Daryl but that's not proof he was the owner of that
workshop nor that he even worked there. Try again.

[Noddy]

Post by Daryl

Post by Noddy
How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no
idea why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of
fucked up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to
meet someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications, I might have
been asked to show mine when I applied for the job at Ford but since
that was 47yrs ago in 1977 I can't remember if it was a requirement or not.
Just for Felix I don't need to see a piece of paper to know whether or
not you are a competent mechanic, its obvious that you know what you are
doing just by looking in your workshop and I deliberately used the term
competent rather than qualified because IMHO competence is far more
important than qualified.
Also for Felix I have been to the site of your Altona workshop, you were
out of it by the time we meet but the place was exactly as described.

These people are completely crazy. They live in a deluded little fantasy
world were everything they want to be true magically *is*, and for no
reason other than them telling themselves so.

It's scary that they walk amongst us in the real world :)

[Daryl]

Post by Noddy

Post by Daryl

Post by Noddy
How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service
manager before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's
qualifications and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite
honest I have no idea why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't
know what kind of fucked up world you live in, but I certainly don't
extend my hand to meet someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications, I might have
been asked to show mine when I applied for the job at Ford but since
that was 47yrs ago in 1977 I can't remember if it was a requirement or not.
Just for Felix I don't need to see a piece of paper to know whether or
not you are a competent mechanic, its obvious that you know what you
are doing just by looking in your workshop and I deliberately used the
term competent rather than qualified because IMHO competence is far
more important than qualified.
Also for Felix I have been to the site of your Altona workshop, you
were out of it by the time we meet but the place was exactly as
described.

These people are completely crazy. They live in a deluded little fantasy
world were everything they want to be true magically *is*, and for no
reason other than them telling themselves so.
It's scary that they walk amongst us in the real world :)

LOL, they seem to live in some sort of alternative reality:-)

[Clocky]

Post by Daryl

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no
idea why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of
fucked up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to
meet someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications, I might have
been asked to show mine when I applied for the job at Ford but since
that was 47yrs ago in 1977 I can't remember if it was a requirement or not.
Just for Felix I don't need to see a piece of paper to know whether or
not you are a competent mechanic, its obvious that you know what you are
doing just by looking in your workshop

Shiny tools and floor makes for a competent cleaner, not mechanic.

and I deliberately used the term

Post by Daryl
competent rather than qualified because IMHO competence is far more
important than qualified.

We know he's incompetent by what he posts here and being qualified would
certainly have helped him avoid many of his issues and downright idiotic
and bizarre theories and claims. Qualified people will understand this,
why you can't is a mystery - unless of course you're not capable of
distinguishing between competent and incompetent people. Given you
dropped out of the trade to clean dunnies (and there is nothing wrong
with that) it is a distinct possibility.

That you're so gullible and naive to fall for his smoke and mirrors act
and have never questioned his qualifications given his countless
examples of incompetence doesn't say much for your judgement or
credibility I'm afraid. I think you're a decent bloke but clearly you're
not capable of critical thought.

Post by Daryl
Also for Felix I have been to the site of your Altona workshop, you were
out of it by the time we meet but the place was exactly as described.

Nobody is disputing the site exist but was he ever there? Unlikely if
you look at the facts.

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Daryl

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've
ever made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very*
big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service
manager before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's
qualifications and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite
honest I have no idea why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't
know what kind of fucked up world you live in, but I certainly don't
extend my hand to meet someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications,

I have a friend who is very highly qualified in the IT field and has
worked in senior positions in IT in some of the maior companies and
corporations of Australia, including Telstra and the ANZ bank, and
regularly dealt and liaised with CEO's and senior management. I have
never seen his qualifications either, but if he said he had
such-and-such a degree I would not doubt it for a minute.

Post by Daryl
I might have been asked to show mine when I applied for the job at
Ford but since that was 47yrs ago in 1977 I can't remember if it was a
requirement or not.
Just for Felix I don't need to see a piece of paper to know whether or
not you are a competent mechanic, its obvious that you know what you
are doing just by looking in your workshop and I deliberately used the
term competent rather than qualified because IMHO competence is far
more important than qualified.

his workshop certainly suggests that he knows what he's doing, but his
competence and ability is a different matter to whether he has any
formal automotive qualifications and what they are

Post by Daryl
Also for Felix I have been to the site of your Altona workshop, you
were out of it by the time we meet but the place was exactly as
described.

afaik he has never described it. and did he own it or just work there?
and strange that in all the time that this matter has been discussed he
has never posted even one photo of 'Noddy's Automotive' where supposedly
'more exotic cars than you can poke a stick at' were repaired and/or
serviced. IMO the exotic car claim is simply a mental fabrication that
was made just to big himself up, and to date there's not one skerrrick
of evidence, apart from your say so, and NA ever existed.

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Daryl
ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications,

I have a friend who is very highly qualified in the IT field and has
worked in senior positions in IT in some of the maior companies and
corporations of Australia, including Telstra and the ANZ bank, and
regularly dealt and liaised with CEO's and senior management. I have
never seen his qualifications either, but if he said he had
such-and-such a degree I would not doubt it for a minute.

That's nice. So what?

Post by Mighty Mouse
afaik he has never described it. and did he own it or just work there?
and strange that in all the time that this matter has been discussed he
has never posted even one photo of 'Noddy's Automotive' where supposedly
'more exotic cars than you can poke a stick at' were repaired and/or
serviced. IMO the exotic car claim is simply a mental fabrication that
was made just to big himself up, and to date there's not one skerrrick
of evidence, apart from your say so, and NA ever existed.

As has been mentioned to you *many* times now, it's a free country and
you can choose to believe whatever you like. But why you feel the need
to continually talk about this as if it's a matter of national
importance is a complete mystery known only to you and your mental mates.

That's the thing that "normal" people struggle with here, Felix. You've
been talking about this for *years* and saying the same things over and
over as if they're new comments that you've never mentioned before each
time you do. You're no further along in your understanding of things
than you were years ago, and yet you *still* harp on about it as if it's
important.

What's that saying? "Stupid" is defined as doing the same thing over and
over and expecting a different result?

Intelligent people would have given up a *long* time ago.....

[Xeno]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Daryl
ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my
life have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications,

I have a friend who is very highly qualified in the IT field and has
worked in senior positions in IT in some of the maior companies and
corporations of Australia, including Telstra and the ANZ bank, and
regularly dealt and liaised with CEO's and senior management. I have
never seen his qualifications either, but if he said he had
such-and-such a degree I would not doubt it for a minute.

That's nice. So what?

Honest people get believed, dishonest people, like you for instance,
don't get believed. It's a matter of trust and, yeah, I get it that
trust is a concept alien to your entire existence.

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
afaik he has never described it. and did he own it or just work there?
and strange that in all the time that this matter has been discussed
he has never posted even one photo of 'Noddy's Automotive' where
supposedly 'more exotic cars than you can poke a stick at' were
repaired and/or serviced. IMO the exotic car claim is simply a mental
fabrication that was made just to big himself up, and to date there's
not one skerrrick of evidence, apart from your say so, and NA ever
existed.

As has been mentioned to you *many* times now, it's a free country and
you can choose to believe whatever you like. But why you feel the need

And we choose not to believe a habitual liar such as yourself!

Post by Noddy
to continually talk about this as if it's a matter of national

You need to be reminded of your lies!

Post by Noddy
importance is a complete mystery known only to you and your mental mates.

Trade qualifications these days are *national accreditations*. Your
fraudulent claims to national accreditations is a matter of national
importance. Way too many fakes like you around pretending to be
qualified and ripping people off.

Post by Noddy
That's the thing that "normal" people struggle with here, Felix. You've

You will *never* be accused of being *normal* Darren. Delusional, yes, a
liar, yes, but *normal*??? No way!

Post by Noddy
been talking about this for *years* and saying the same things over and
over as if they're new comments that you've never mentioned before each

You keep lying, we keep talking about it, simples!

Post by Noddy
time you do. You're no further along in your understanding of things
than you were years ago, and yet you *still* harp on about it as if it's
important.
What's that saying? "Stupid" is defined as doing the same thing over and
over and expecting a different result?

Yeah, that's right, you keep claiming you're qualified expecting people
to believe you. You have been making such claims in excess of 20 years
now and I'll wager that far fewer people believe you now than did in the
beginning when first you made the fraudulent claims. Even Daryl doesn't
believe you and is making *pithy excuses*.

Post by Noddy
Intelligent people would have given up a *long* time ago.....

We intelligent people gave up expecting you to be honest, ever! That
doesn't mean we can't ask the relevant questions from the *elephant* in
the room!

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Daryl
ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my
life have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications,

I have a friend who is very highly qualified in the IT field and has
worked in senior positions in IT in some of the maior companies and
corporations of Australia, including Telstra and the ANZ bank, and
regularly dealt and liaised with CEO's and senior management. I have
never seen his qualifications either, but if he said he had
such-and-such a degree I would not doubt it for a minute.

That's nice. So what?

Honest people get believed, dishonest people, like you for instance,
don't get believed. It's a matter of trust and, yeah, I get it that
trust is a concept alien to your entire existence.

he bangs on about others being stupid but the reality is he's more
stupid than anyone because the most basic of things have to be explained
to him

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
afaik he has never described it. and did he own it or just work
there? and strange that in all the time that this matter has been
discussed he has never posted even one photo of 'Noddy's Automotive'
where supposedly 'more exotic cars than you can poke a stick at'
were repaired and/or serviced. IMO the exotic car claim is simply a
mental fabrication that was made just to big himself up, and to date
there's not one skerrrick of evidence, apart from your say so, and
NA ever existed.

As has been mentioned to you *many* times now, it's a free country
and you can choose to believe whatever you like. But why you feel the
need

And we choose not to believe a habitual liar such as yourself!

Post by Noddy
to continually talk about this as if it's a matter of national

You need to be reminded of your lies!

Post by Noddy
importance is a complete mystery known only to you and your mental mates.

Trade qualifications these days are *national accreditations*. Your
fraudulent claims to national accreditations is a matter of national
importance. Way too many fakes like you around pretending to be
qualified and ripping people off.

Post by Noddy
That's the thing that "normal" people struggle with here, Felix. You've

You will *never* be accused of being *normal* Darren. Delusional, yes,
a liar, yes, but *normal*???  No way!

never in a million years!..

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy
been talking about this for *years* and saying the same things over
and over as if they're new comments that you've never mentioned
before each

You keep lying, we keep talking about it, simples!

Post by Noddy
time you do. You're no further along in your understanding of things
than you were years ago, and yet you *still* harp on about it as if
it's important.
What's that saying? "Stupid" is defined as doing the same thing over
and over and expecting a different result?

Yeah, that's right, you keep claiming you're qualified expecting
people to believe you. You have been making such claims in excess of
20 years now and I'll wager that far fewer people believe you now than
did in the beginning when first you made the fraudulent claims. Even
Daryl doesn't believe you and is making *pithy excuses*.

Post by Noddy
Intelligent people would have given up a *long* time ago.....

We intelligent people gave up expecting you to be honest, ever! That
doesn't mean we can't ask the relevant questions from the *elephant*
in the room!

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse
he bangs on about others being stupid but the reality is he's more
stupid than anyone because the most basic of things have to be explained
to him

From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for his
car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

He's here all week folks. Saying the same nonsensical shit over and over :)

[Xeno]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he bangs on about others being stupid but the reality is he's more
stupid than anyone because the most basic of things have to be
explained to him

From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for his
car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....
He's here all week folks. Saying the same nonsensical shit over and over :)

Darren's biting, Felix must be right on the mark!

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Xeno

Post by Mighty Mouse
he bangs on about others being stupid but the reality is he's more
stupid than anyone because the most basic of things have to be
explained to him

 From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....
He's here all week folks. Saying the same nonsensical shit over and over :)

Darren's biting, Felix must be right on the mark!

:)

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he bangs on about others being stupid but the reality is he's more
stupid than anyone because the most basic of things have to be
explained to him

From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for his
car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Post by Noddy
He's here all week folks. Saying the same nonsensical shit over and over :)

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for his
car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

[Clocky]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks collectively
so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.

In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

[alvey]

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks collectively
so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

And while we're in Reality... What's even more farcical is how, even
after the body-work of Truth has been given the Gibbens Treatment, the
resultant low level of *error* not only dooms someone to a lifetime of
spiteful denigration and abuse, but in some loons opinions, it's also of
equal magnitude to Fraudsters' whopping great *lies*. Bizarre.



alvey

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks
collectively so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

yep. the Goebbels method

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks
collectively so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

yep. the Goebbels method

From the thread "New Game In Sydney" of May 2016:

Posted by "Clocky"

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

I didn't read the fine print on the back label. I had no
idea coolant was that specific, and no one in the store
told me either

This is what Dunning-Kruger is all about. You had no idea
that you didn't have a clue.

and why would I? there was no warning on the label, and no advice from
the staff, who possibly didn't know either that coolant is vehicle
specific. you should go to the shop and inform them about messers
Dunning and Kruger. off you go!

Post by Mighty Mouse
There's nothing terribly
wrong with that of itself, but to reject the advice of
people who have vastly more experience about automotive
things than you based on your own personal whims is
pretty stupid.

what advice did I reject?

You just post this stuff to bring out the worst in people in total
frustration don't you? That's what this is about and what you get off on.
You're being a complete fucking pillock I hope you realise.

The funniest thing about this is that the bloke who called you a
"complete fucking pillock" is *now* your best buddy around here and
*defends* you for the very thing he initially dumped on you for.

This "Clocky" has a habit of befriending fuckwits. Doesn't he? :)

[Xeno]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks
collectively so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

yep. the Goebbels method

Posted by "Clocky"

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

I didn't read the fine print on the back label. I had no
idea coolant was that specific, and no one in the store
told me either

This is what Dunning-Kruger is all about. You had no idea
that you didn't have a clue.

and why would I? there was no warning on the label, and no advice from
the staff, who possibly didn't know either that coolant is vehicle
specific. you should go to the shop and inform them about messers
Dunning and Kruger. off you go!

Post by Mighty Mouse
There's nothing terribly
wrong with that of itself, but to reject the advice of
people who have vastly more experience about automotive
things than you based on your own personal whims is
pretty stupid.

what advice did I reject?

You just post this stuff to bring out the worst in people in total
frustration don't you? That's what this is about and what you get off on.
You're being a complete fucking pillock I hope you realise.

The funniest thing about this is that the bloke who called you a
"complete fucking pillock" is *now* your best buddy around here and
*defends* you for the very thing he initially dumped on you for.
This "Clocky" has a habit of befriending fuckwits. Doesn't he? :)

You should have directed that accusation at Daryl, and you are the proof.

[Clocky]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks
collectively so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

yep. the Goebbels method

Posted by "Clocky"

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

I didn't read the fine print on the back label. I had no
idea coolant was that specific, and no one in the store
told me either

This is what Dunning-Kruger is all about. You had no idea
that you didn't have a clue.

and why would I? there was no warning on the label, and no advice from
the staff, who possibly didn't know either that coolant is vehicle
specific. you should go to the shop and inform them about messers
Dunning and Kruger. off you go!

Post by Mighty Mouse
There's nothing terribly
wrong with that of itself, but to reject the advice of
people who have vastly more experience about automotive
things than you based on your own personal whims is
pretty stupid.

what advice did I reject?

You just post this stuff to bring out the worst in people in total
frustration don't you? That's what this is about and what you get off on.
You're being a complete fucking pillock I hope you realise.

The funniest thing about this is that the bloke who called you a
"complete fucking pillock" is *now* your best buddy around here and
*defends* you for the very thing he initially dumped on you for.

I've had many disagreements with felix, Xeno and Alvey and undoubtedly
there will be quite a few more.
You and your enablers OTOH...

Post by Noddy
This "Clocky" has a habit of befriending fuckwits. Doesn't he? :)

Says the bloke who is so desperate for mates that he now relies on the
"village idiot" for support.

[jonz]

Post by Clocky

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks
collectively so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

yep. the Goebbels method

Posted by "Clocky"

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

I didn't read the fine print on the back label. I had no
idea coolant was that specific, and no one in the store
told me either

This is what Dunning-Kruger is all about. You had no idea
that you didn't have a clue.

and why would I? there was no warning on the label, and no advice from
the staff, who possibly didn't know either that coolant is vehicle
specific. you should go to the shop and inform them about messers
Dunning and Kruger. off you go!

Post by Mighty Mouse
There's nothing terribly
wrong with that of itself, but to reject the advice of
people who have vastly more experience about automotive
things than you based on your own personal whims is
pretty stupid.

what advice did I reject?

You just post this stuff to bring out the worst in people in total
frustration don't you? That's what this is about and what you get off on.
You're being a complete fucking pillock I hope you realise.

The funniest thing about this is that the bloke who called you a
"complete fucking pillock" is *now* your best buddy around here and
*defends* you for the very thing he initially dumped on you for.

I've had many disagreements with felix, Xeno and Alvey and undoubtedly
there will be quite a few more.
You and your enablers OTOH...

Post by Noddy
This "Clocky" has a habit of befriending fuckwits. Doesn't he? :)

Says the bloke who is so desperate for mates that he now relies on the
"village idiot" for support.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`

 OH-NO! <FBG>. You need to restock yer armoury Wally......That wee
riposte is a fizzer. FFFFFFFFFffffffffffffffffffff.................<POP>
:):):)

[alvey]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks
collectively so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

yep. the Goebbels method

Posted by "Clocky"

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

I didn't read the fine print on the back label. I had no
idea coolant was that specific, and no one in the store
told me either

This is what Dunning-Kruger is all about. You had no idea
that you didn't have a clue.

and why would I? there was no warning on the label, and no advice from
the staff, who possibly didn't know either that coolant is vehicle
specific. you should go to the shop and inform them about messers
Dunning and Kruger. off you go!

Post by Mighty Mouse
There's nothing terribly
wrong with that of itself, but to reject the advice of
people who have vastly more experience about automotive
things than you based on your own personal whims is
pretty stupid.

what advice did I reject?

You just post this stuff to bring out the worst in people in total
frustration don't you? That's what this is about and what you get off on.
You're being a complete fucking pillock I hope you realise.

The funniest thing about this is that the bloke who called you a
"complete fucking pillock" is *now* your best buddy around here and
*defends* you for the very thing he initially dumped on you for.
This "Clocky" has a habit of befriending fuckwits. Doesn't he? :)

What's all that got to do with you being a serial liar, monstrous
hypocrite, fraud, abusive gobshite and whining coward Buffo?



alvey

[jonz]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

Every... single... time... without fail.
Then repeats it until it becomes his truth and then speaks
collectively so in his mind it has become everyone's truth.
In reality it's mostly his lies and fabrication.

yep. the Goebbels method

Posted by "Clocky"

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

I didn't read the fine print on the back label. I had no
idea coolant was that specific, and no one in the store
told me either

This is what Dunning-Kruger is all about. You had no idea
that you didn't have a clue.

and why would I? there was no warning on the label, and no advice from
the staff, who possibly didn't know either that coolant is vehicle
specific. you should go to the shop and inform them about messers
Dunning and Kruger. off you go!

Post by Mighty Mouse
There's nothing terribly
wrong with that of itself, but to reject the advice of
people who have vastly more experience about automotive
things than you based on your own personal whims is
pretty stupid.

what advice did I reject?

You just post this stuff to bring out the worst in people in total
frustration don't you? That's what this is about and what you get off on.
You're being a complete fucking pillock I hope you realise.

The funniest thing about this is that the bloke who called you a
"complete fucking pillock" is *now* your best buddy around here and
*defends* you for the very thing he initially dumped on you for.
This "Clocky" has a habit of befriending fuckwits. Doesn't he? :)

What's all that got to do with being a serial liar, monstrous
hypocrite, fraud, abusive gobshite and whining coward Buffo?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 Why are you asking him?. You have to come to terms with *that* problem
yerself!. Face up to it shitfer!. HTH

alvey

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?

That makes you even *more* stupid.....

[alvey]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

Oh give it up Gibbens! Just accept that you're never, ever going to be
the smartest bloke in the room. Everyone else has...



alvey

[Xeno]

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

Oh give it up Gibbens! Just accept that you're never, ever going to be
the smartest bloke in the room. Everyone else has...

Puir wee Darren, he's not even in the race. He proved that when he
couldn't face that all important year 9 exam, you know, the one where
*failure* prevented him from ever qualifying for any apprenticeship
ever. So that makes *Darren* the *dumbest bloke in the room*. Even Jonz
got the jump on him since he did manage to score an apprenticeship.
Really, Darren should just stop projecting his insecurities upon others,
it just makes him look more of a tool (if that is even possible).

Post by alvey
alvey

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant
for his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the
label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

Oh give it up Gibbens! Just accept that you're never, ever going to be
the smartest bloke in the room. Everyone else has...

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Post by alvey
alvey

[Keithr0]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant
for his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the
label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

Oh give it up Gibbens! Just accept that you're never, ever going to be
the smartest bloke in the room. Everyone else has...

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Why? He's a big boy, he can look after himself. You, on the other hand,
seem to need a team to back you up.

[jonz]

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant
for his car even when reading the list of suitable models on
the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

Oh give it up Gibbens! Just accept that you're never, ever going to
be the smartest bloke in the room. Everyone else has...

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Why? He's a big boy, he can look after himself. You, on the other
hand, seem to need a team to back you up.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yairs,  A team of *disparate desperate`s*  Blind leading the blind,
going around in circles in their own manure!. <Chuckle>

[alvey]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant
for his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the
label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

Oh give it up Gibbens! Just accept that you're never, ever going to be
the smartest bloke in the room. Everyone else has...

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

If Richo can't bail himself out then what hope does he have with Fraudster?


alvey
Would like to see him try though...

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Will he?

Maybe he'll dig up the comments Jerky made about you at the time? We
sure as shit know that Alvey is far to gutless to go there, despite his
love of such things :)

[alvey]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this
is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with
fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Will he?
We sure as shit know that Alvey is far to gutless to go there,

Go 'where' Buffo? Your articulation is as useful as battery-less torch
on a dark night for illuminating what you're trying to say.

And that's a huge lol on "gutless". There's no-one in my killfile
Fraudster. Yourself?

Post by Noddy
despite his love of such things :)

Nope. No idea what you're talking about. You should sign-up for some
online classes in Subsistence English. Success there would certainly
help you in explaining the anomaly of those phantom children. Buffoon.


alvey

[jonz]

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one.
this is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it
with fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Will he?
We sure as shit know that Alvey is far to gutless to go there,

Go 'where' Buffo? Your articulation is as useful as battery-less torch
on a dark night for illuminating what you're trying to say.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nup yer just too fuckin stoopid!.

Post by alvey
And that's a huge lol on "gutless". There's no-one in my killfile
Fraudster. Yourself?

Post by Noddy
despite his love of such things :)

Nope. No idea what you're talking about. You should sign-up for some
online classes in Subsistence English. Success there would certainly
help you in explaining the anomaly of those phantom children. Buffoon.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~```

 Gutless?, hell yeah, You *know* exactly what he`s on about!!.
Definitely *Gutless* and, once again for effect, *Too fuckin' stoopid*

  A failed Rabble rouser!.

Post by alvey
alvey

[alvey]

Post by jonz

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one.
this is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it
with fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Will he?
We sure as shit know that Alvey is far to gutless to go there,

Go 'where' Buffo? Your articulation is as useful as battery-less torch
on a dark night for illuminating what you're trying to say.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nup yer just too fuckin stoopid!.

Could be worse.
I could be "fuckin stoopid" *and* illiterate...



alvey

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by alvey

Post by jonz

Post by alvey

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one.
this is what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it
with fiction to make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

but keefy will be along shortly to try to bail him out

Will he?
We sure as shit know that Alvey is far to gutless to go there,

Go 'where' Buffo? Your articulation is as useful as battery-less
torch on a dark night for illuminating what you're trying to say.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nup yer just too fuckin stoopid!.

Could be worse.
I could be "fuckin stoopid" *and* illiterate...

and a bogan

Post by alvey
alvey

[Noddy]

Post by Mighty Mouse
and a bogan

You really shouldn't talk about your mate Jerky like this Felix. I know
he's a Commodore fanboi, and I know he's a "metal" fan. Shit we all know
he can't tell the difference between glass and plastic, and thinks
you're a "fucking pillock", but if you keep bagging him like this he
won't be your friend anymore and you'll have to reply on the mental case
as your only source of bullshit.

You don't want that. Surely.... :)

[Xeno]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Noddy
From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for
his car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....

except I didn't. another lie.

Yeah, right. You might not remember, but everyone else does :)

i didn't read the label, that's *why* i bought the wrong one. this is
what you always do. you take a bit of fact and mix it with fiction to
make up a story.

You read the label eventually, which is why you took it back. Right?
That makes you even *more* stupid.....

No one, I repeat, no one, can ever hold a candle to your stupidity
Darren. Your stupidity plumbs new depths. I'm truly surprised your brain
can still manage to control your breathing while you devote all its
available energy to pecking out the above drivel.

[alvey]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he bangs on about others being stupid but the reality is he's more
stupid than anyone because the most basic of things have to be
explained to him

From the absolute moron who can't even buy the correct coolant for his
car even when reading the list of suitable models on the label....
He's here all week folks. Saying the same nonsensical shit over and over :)

Fraudster: Mirror mirror on the wall, who is the stupidest of us all?
FX: Pause
Fraudster: Mirror? Are you there?
FX: Pause
Fraudster: [raging] Answer me you stupid cunt! Why won't you answer me?



alvey

[alvey]

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Daryl
ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my
life have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications,

I have a friend who is very highly qualified in the IT field and has
worked in senior positions in IT in some of the maior companies and
corporations of Australia, including Telstra and the ANZ bank, and
regularly dealt and liaised with CEO's and senior management. I have
never seen his qualifications either, but if he said he had
such-and-such a degree I would not doubt it for a minute.

That's nice. So what?

Post by Mighty Mouse
afaik he has never described it. and did he own it or just work there?
and strange that in all the time that this matter has been discussed
he has never posted even one photo of 'Noddy's Automotive' where
supposedly 'more exotic cars than you can poke a stick at' were
repaired and/or serviced. IMO the exotic car claim is simply a mental
fabrication that was made just to big himself up, and to date there's
not one skerrrick of evidence, apart from your say so, and NA ever
existed.

As has been mentioned to you *many* times now, it's a free country and
you can choose to believe whatever you like. But why you feel the need
to continually talk about this as if it's a matter of national
importance is a complete mystery known only to you and your mental mates.

Yawn. Another OG.

[alvey]

Post by Mighty Mouse
afaik he has never described it. and did he own it or just work there?
and strange that in all the time that this matter has been discussed he
has never posted even one photo of 'Noddy's Automotive' where supposedly
'more exotic cars than you can poke a stick at' were repaired and/or
serviced. IMO the exotic car claim is simply a mental fabrication that
was made just to big himself up, and to date there's not one skerrrick
of evidence, apart from your say so, and NA ever existed.

You mean, 'Noddy's Automotive of the Slough Industrial Estate' (NASIA).
There *was* a registered business 'Noddy's Automotive', but this was
recorded as having a 'Place of Business at Buffos' parents residence in
suburban Altona. And strangely, only for a couple of years in the mid-1990s.

[Stan]

Post by Daryl

Post by Noddy

Post by Mighty Mouse
he's describing himself, not me. my qualifications are real, my
business was real, and my jobs were real. and as for 'talking shit',
if anyone disagrees with what I say, they're at liberty to dispute it.

I'm genuinely struggling to see how anyone could "dispute" something
that you've never mentioned and steadfastly refuse to do so :)
This would have to be the single, most nonsensical comment you've ever
made, and considering some of your past efforts that's a *very* big call.

Post by Mighty Mouse
if he had ever done all that he claimed, why wouldn't his best mate
Daryl confirm it? but Daryl has never supported any of these claims,
or any others afaik eg. Honda service manager

How would someone like Daryl ever know, Felix? I was a service manager
before I ever met him. I've never asked to see Daryl's qualifications
and he's never asked to see mine, and to be quite honest I have no
idea why either of us would ever *want* to. I don't know what kind of
fucked up world you live in, but I certainly don't extend my hand to
meet someone and then ask to see "zer Papars".

ROTFL, don't know what world Felix and co live in but never in my life
have I ever asked anyone to show me their qualifications,

As opposed to your primordial swamp Deryl, it's one where we can
comprehend and stick to the point. I know that, like your singer, you're
a huge fan of the killfile, but surely you must have read at least a
couple of dozen posts which reminded y'all that the heat is on your
gobshite little mate because he *LIED* about having quals. GOT IT?

Post by Daryl
Also for Felix I have been to the site of your Altona workshop, you were
out of it by the time we meet but the place was exactly as described.

Oh gawd.

Ok Deryl, here's a chance for you to man up. What was that "exact
description"?



alvey

[alvey]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something
publicly then they should know it can be commented on. but then to
start deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post into
a newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it and the
other half dozen or so people couldn't care less either way. Just my
opinion, but the juice doesn't seem to be worth anything like the
squeeze there.
I'll bet he's fun at parties....

I'll bet you're the *death* of parties as you blast people with your
bullshit spiels and self aggrandising lies!

he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

Gak! Now there's a truly frightening scenario! Imagine, if you can,
going to a party in Bumhole (Vic) where Darrens are thick on the ground!
You'd chew you own leg off to escape it.



alvey

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by alvey

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy

Post by Keithr0

Post by Mighty Mouse
it's a bit of a fine line I think. if someone says something
publicly then they should know it can be commented on. but then
to start deviling into their personal life is taking it too far imo.

Well, you can always outsource that stuff to alvey, he seems to enjoy it.

Yeah, you'd have to wonder about the mental state of someone who is
happy to spend considerable time trawling through decades worth of
ancient posts in the hope of finding some tidbit that he'll post
into a newsgroup where the object of his angst won't even see it
and the other half dozen or so people couldn't care less either
way. Just my opinion, but the juice doesn't seem to be worth
anything like the squeeze there.
I'll bet he's fun at parties....

I'll bet you're the *death* of parties as you blast people with your
bullshit spiels and self aggrandising lies!

he doesn't get to go to them. no one invites him to any :)

Gak! Now there's a truly frightening scenario! Imagine, if you can,
going to a party in Bumhole (Vic) where Darrens are thick on the
ground! You'd chew you own leg off to escape it.

LOL

Post by alvey
alvey

[Noddy]

Post by alvey
Gak! Now there's a truly frightening scenario! Imagine, if you can,
going to a party in Bumhole (Vic) where Darrens are thick on the
ground! You'd chew you own leg off to escape it.

LOL

Could be worse, Felix. Could be like the mental case where he has to sit
in a corner with his Ipad to amuse himself as no one will ever talk to
him. Even his own wife won't talk to him when they go out for dinner.

These are his own comments Felix. Ask him :)

[Clocky]

Post by Noddy

Post by alvey
Gak! Now there's a truly frightening scenario! Imagine, if you can,
going to a party in Bumhole (Vic) where Darrens are thick on the
ground! You'd chew you own leg off to escape it.

LOL

Could be worse, Felix. Could be like the mental case where he has to sit
in a corner with his Ipad to amuse himself as no one will ever talk to
him. Even his own wife won't talk to him when they go out for dinner.
These are his own comments Felix. Ask him :)

You claimed you had a BBQ at your place with many friends, even
dignitaries but then the truth was revealed that it was a street party
down the road, not at your house and it seemed likely that you weren't
even invited.

Again, you told a great big whopping lie in an attempt to bignote
yourself that backfired rather spectacularly.

[alvey]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they
will be fully aware of the difference between right and wrong.
Hopefully, the people within the education system who are charged
with that same task will also strive to ensure that not only my
children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting something
along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another kid and him
saying that she could have it only if she looked after it or words
along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this.

That's understandable, but I don't believe my avenue of enquiry is
transgressing any moral line. It's not even a 'like for like'
retaliation as I have absolutely no intention of replicating any of the
disgraceful things which this sad little keyboard hardman has said of
others' family members. All I'm asking is how many kids he's sired. And
let's not forget, it was Fraudster who piously introduced them into his
simpering lecture. Given that he's a compulsive liar it'd almost be a
dereliction of duty *not* to question this oddity. And given that
history, the odds of any family tragedy are pretty small.

Post by Mighty Mouse
I know he says he doesn't care what
anyone has to say about him, or calls him,

Annnnd there's an example of his inability to tell the truth right
there. As has been pointed out to The Frothing Fraudster a zillion
times, if you "doesn't care" then why the Hell are >= 90% of your posts
direct references/whinges/attacks against your 'enemies'.

Post by Mighty Mouse
but the personal life, and
especially family matters, of anyone here is no one's business but their
own, and especially also since it's irrelevant to the purpose of this forum.

Again, I don't believe that asking a serial liar to clarify something
he's written is breaking the 11th commandment.


alvey

[Mighty Mouse]

Post by alvey

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this.

That's understandable, but I don't believe my avenue of enquiry is
transgressing any moral line. It's not even a 'like for like'
retaliation as I have absolutely no intention of replicating any of
the disgraceful things which this sad little keyboard hardman has said
of others' family members. All I'm asking is how many kids he's sired.
And let's not forget, it was Fraudster who piously introduced them
into his simpering lecture. Given that he's a compulsive liar it'd
almost be a dereliction of duty *not* to question this oddity. And
given that history, the odds of any family tragedy are pretty small.

Post by Mighty Mouse
I know he says he doesn't care what anyone has to say about him, or
calls him,

Annnnd there's an example of his inability to tell the truth right
there. As has been pointed out to The Frothing Fraudster a zillion
times, if you "doesn't care" then why the Hell are >= 90% of your
posts direct references/whinges/attacks against your 'enemies'.

Post by Mighty Mouse
but the personal life, and especially family matters, of anyone here
is no one's business but their own, and especially also since it's
irrelevant to the purpose of this forum.

Again, I don't believe that asking a serial liar to clarify something
he's written is breaking the 11th commandment.

what you do is up to you, I'm just saying it's not something I want to
get into. but if i was a betting man, which I'm not.. well, apart from
tattslotto, powerball, ozlotto, RSL lottery, Mater lottery, RMH Home
lottery, and... err..oh.. as I was saying, which I'm not.. I would put
my money on the two kid thing being just another porky, if I was a
betting man that is, which I'm not.

Post by alvey
alvey

[Clocky]

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by alvey

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off
a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this.

That's understandable, but I don't believe my avenue of enquiry is
transgressing any moral line. It's not even a 'like for like'
retaliation as I have absolutely no intention of replicating any of
the disgraceful things which this sad little keyboard hardman has said
of others' family members. All I'm asking is how many kids he's sired.
And let's not forget, it was Fraudster who piously introduced them
into his simpering lecture. Given that he's a compulsive liar it'd
almost be a dereliction of duty *not* to question this oddity. And
given that history, the odds of any family tragedy are pretty small.

Post by Mighty Mouse
I know he says he doesn't care what anyone has to say about him, or
calls him,

Annnnd there's an example of his inability to tell the truth right
there. As has been pointed out to The Frothing Fraudster a zillion
times, if you "doesn't care" then why the Hell are >= 90% of your
posts direct references/whinges/attacks against your 'enemies'.

Post by Mighty Mouse
but the personal life, and especially family matters, of anyone here
is no one's business but their own, and especially also since it's
irrelevant to the purpose of this forum.

Again, I don't believe that asking a serial liar to clarify something
he's written is breaking the 11th commandment.

what you do is up to you, I'm just saying it's not something I want to
get into. but if i was a betting man, which I'm not.. well, apart from
tattslotto, powerball, ozlotto, RSL lottery, Mater lottery, RMH Home
lottery, and... err..oh.. as I was saying, which I'm not.. I would put
my money on the two kid thing being just another porky, if I was a
betting man that is, which I'm not.

Post by alvey
alvey

His form would suggest it's a lie.

[alvey]

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by alvey

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went
off a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous
lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who are
charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that not
only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this.

That's understandable, but I don't believe my avenue of enquiry is
transgressing any moral line. It's not even a 'like for like'
retaliation as I have absolutely no intention of replicating any of
the disgraceful things which this sad little keyboard hardman has
said of others' family members. All I'm asking is how many kids he's
sired. And let's not forget, it was Fraudster who piously introduced
them into his simpering lecture. Given that he's a compulsive liar
it'd almost be a dereliction of duty *not* to question this oddity.
And given that history, the odds of any family tragedy are pretty small.

Post by Mighty Mouse
I know he says he doesn't care what anyone has to say about him, or
calls him,

Annnnd there's an example of his inability to tell the truth right
there. As has been pointed out to The Frothing Fraudster a zillion
times, if you "doesn't care" then why the Hell are >= 90% of your
posts direct references/whinges/attacks against your 'enemies'.

Post by Mighty Mouse
but the personal life, and especially family matters, of anyone here
is no one's business but their own, and especially also since it's
irrelevant to the purpose of this forum.

Again, I don't believe that asking a serial liar to clarify something
he's written is breaking the 11th commandment.

what you do is up to you, I'm just saying it's not something I want to
get into. but if i was a betting man, which I'm not.. well, apart from
tattslotto, powerball, ozlotto, RSL lottery, Mater lottery, RMH Home
lottery, and... err..oh.. as I was saying, which I'm not.. I would put
my money on the two kid thing being just another porky, if I was a
betting man that is, which I'm not.

Post by alvey
alvey

His form would suggest it's a lie.

Yep, certainly does. Anyways, we'll find out shortly as Fraudster *must*
be here soon...



alvey

[alvey]

Post by alvey

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by alvey

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Mighty Mouse

Post by Clocky

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a
bang' lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's
an only child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went
off a'Googling and discovered this in one of your pompous
lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human
beings with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and
they will be fully aware of the difference between right and
wrong. Hopefully, the people within the education system who
are charged with that same task will also strive to ensure that
not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the
major anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you
explain how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA

Oh dear...

it's possible he may have lost a child.

It would mean he's lost two. I do seem to recall him posting
something along the lines of his Mrs. wanting (or wanted) another
kid and him saying that she could have it only if she looked after
it or words along those lines. That would have been the last one then.

I'm not comfortable discussing this.

That's understandable, but I don't believe my avenue of enquiry is
transgressing any moral line. It's not even a 'like for like'
retaliation as I have absolutely no intention of replicating any of
the disgraceful things which this sad little keyboard hardman has
said of others' family members. All I'm asking is how many kids he's
sired. And let's not forget, it was Fraudster who piously introduced
them into his simpering lecture. Given that he's a compulsive liar
it'd almost be a dereliction of duty *not* to question this oddity.
And given that history, the odds of any family tragedy are pretty small.

Post by Mighty Mouse
I know he says he doesn't care what anyone has to say about him, or
calls him,

Annnnd there's an example of his inability to tell the truth right
there. As has been pointed out to The Frothing Fraudster a zillion
times, if you "doesn't care" then why the Hell are >= 90% of your
posts direct references/whinges/attacks against your 'enemies'.

Post by Mighty Mouse
but the personal life, and especially family matters, of anyone
here is no one's business but their own, and especially also since
it's irrelevant to the purpose of this forum.

Again, I don't believe that asking a serial liar to clarify
something he's written is breaking the 11th commandment.

what you do is up to you, I'm just saying it's not something I want
to get into. but if i was a betting man, which I'm not.. well, apart
from tattslotto, powerball, ozlotto, RSL lottery, Mater lottery, RMH
Home lottery, and... err..oh.. as I was saying, which I'm not.. I
would put my money on the two kid thing being just another porky, if
I was a betting man that is, which I'm not.

Post by alvey
alvey

His form would suggest it's a lie.

Yep, certainly does. Anyways, we'll find out shortly as Fraudster *must*
be here soon...

Annny minute now...


alvey

[Edward]

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang' lie
in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only child...".
This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling and discovered
this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same task
will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall hearing
about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain how
it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA
alvey
(a) I've posted the beginning of this quote before (2021), but of course
you failed to respond.

So Fraudster, not a single comment from you on this Phantom Children
affair. Nor even a trickle of abuse. All you've done is a lame (and
stale) diversion attempt about break dancing. Is this a sign that you're
now regretting all those years of being an abusive arsehole and liar?



alvey

[alvey]

Post by Edward

Post by Fred
Just 'tother day (the 6th anniversary of your 'leaving with a bang'
lie in fact), and in regard to your son, you wrote, "He's an only
child...". This tinkled a small memory bell so I went off a'Googling
and discovered this in one of your pompous lectures in A.C.
"Both my son and my daughter will be raised to be decent human beings
with the best of both my wife's and my own ability, and they will be
fully aware of the difference between right and wrong. Hopefully, the
people within the education system who are charged with that same task
will also strive to ensure that not only my children..."
Now there's shedloads to dissect in there but I'll stick to the major
anomalies.
1. Do you deny authoring the quote that is para. 2? (a)
2. How many children have you and the wife had? (I can't recall
hearing about your daughter other than the above)
3. And if you admit that para. 2 is your work, then can you explain
how it was posted on 16Jan01?
So Fraudster, could you co-operate and clear up this very strange oddity?
TIA
alvey
(a) I've posted the beginning of this quote before (2021), but of
course you failed to respond.

So Fraudster, not a single comment from you on this Phantom Children
affair. Nor even a trickle of abuse. All you've done is a lame (and
stale) diversion attempt about break dancing. Is this a sign that you're
now regretting all those years of being an abusive arsehole and liar?

Still nothing then Fraudster? Okey Dokey, I'll add this one to the list
of Whopping Great Lies you've told to try and Big yourself.



alvey