Bloody idiot drivers.

Post by Keithr0
Traveling home this arvo, the road is a 2 lane two way road except at a
set of traffic lights. For a couple of hundred metres each side a left
land is added making a 4 lane dual highway. The lights go red, in front
is a high top van which pulls into the left lane and a car in front of
me in the right lane as am I. The lights go green, but at that moment an
ambulance arrives lights flashing and siren going behind me.
All that has to happen is for the van to stay where he is, the car in
front to pull forward and into the left lane with room for me to follow.
What happens is that the van does the right thing and stays where he is,
but the car in front just sits there transfixed. I'm boxed in with
nowhere to go. Eventually, with some encouragement, he does move forward
and over, and I can get out of the way. What a bloody idiot, even
without the ambulance, he had a green light but he just sat there.

Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was coming
from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?

Dunno. I wasn't there. But some people are spatially defunct.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Daryl

2024-08-29 11:35:12 UTC

Post by Keithr0
Traveling home this arvo, the road is a 2 lane two way road except at
a set of traffic lights. For a couple of hundred metres each side a
left land is added making a 4 lane dual highway. The lights go red, in
front is a high top van which pulls into the left lane and a car in
front of me in the right lane as am I. The lights go green, but at
that moment an ambulance arrives lights flashing and siren going
behind me.
All that has to happen is for the van to stay where he is, the car in
front to pull forward and into the left lane with room for me to follow.
What happens is that the van does the right thing and stays where he
is, but the car in front just sits there transfixed. I'm boxed in with
nowhere to go. Eventually, with some encouragement, he does move
forward and over, and I can get out of the way. What a bloody idiot,
even without the ambulance, he had a green light but he just sat there.

Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was coming
from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?
Dunno. I wasn't there. But some people are spatially defunct.

Pretty sure I know exactly where Keith was, its near my friends house
and there is a new ambulance station not far away.
Ambulances with lights and sirens on are pretty common on that bit of
road mainly due to there being a lot of older people living in that
general area who are prone to medical emergencies so if the driver in
question was a local they should have been used to ambulances.

--
Daryl

Keithr0

2024-08-29 11:35:59 UTC

Post by Keithr0
Traveling home this arvo, the road is a 2 lane two way road except at
a set of traffic lights. For a couple of hundred metres each side a
left land is added making a 4 lane dual highway. The lights go red, in
front is a high top van which pulls into the left lane and a car in
front of me in the right lane as am I. The lights go green, but at
that moment an ambulance arrives lights flashing and siren going
behind me.
All that has to happen is for the van to stay where he is, the car in
front to pull forward and into the left lane with room for me to follow.
What happens is that the van does the right thing and stays where he
is, but the car in front just sits there transfixed. I'm boxed in with
nowhere to go. Eventually, with some encouragement, he does move
forward and over, and I can get out of the way. What a bloody idiot,
even without the ambulance, he had a green light but he just sat there.

Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was coming
from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?

Even if he was deaf, he had a green light, he could have moved off. Not
hard to work out where it was coming from though, the ambulance was on
my back bumper siren blasting, and its flashing lights must have been
visible in his rear view mirror over the top of my car.

Post by Noddy
Dunno. I wasn't there. But some people are spatially defunct.

Noddy

2024-08-29 11:49:56 UTC

Post by Noddy
Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was
coming from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?

Maybe, but it's a fatal error to assume everyone's as clued in as you
are. Some people are really, really stupid.

Look at Felix, for example....

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Xeno

2024-08-29 13:10:51 UTC

Post by Noddy
Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was
coming from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?

Even if he was deaf, he had a green light, he could have moved off.
Not hard to work out where it was coming from though, the ambulance
was on my back bumper siren blasting, and its flashing lights must
have been visible in his rear view mirror over the top of my car.

Maybe, but it's a fatal error to assume everyone's as clued in as you
are. Some people are really, really stupid.
Look at Felix, for example....

See, there you go again! You can't help yourself. You have such a huge
inferiority complex that your only recourse is to try and bring them
down to your level. Sadly, for you, that is so low that you only have
the undersides of snakes for company!

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-29 15:00:56 UTC

Post by Noddy
Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was
coming from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?

Even if he was deaf, he had a green light, he could have moved off.
Not hard to work out where it was coming from though, the ambulance
was on my back bumper siren blasting, and its flashing lights must
have been visible in his rear view mirror over the top of my car.

Maybe, but it's a fatal error to assume everyone's as clued in as you
are. Some people are really, really stupid.
Look at Felix, for example....

and he lies to do it

--
Have a nice day!..

Noddy

2024-08-29 21:51:25 UTC

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy
Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was
coming from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?

Even if he was deaf, he had a green light, he could have moved off.
Not hard to work out where it was coming from though, the ambulance
was on my back bumper siren blasting, and its flashing lights must
have been visible in his rear view mirror over the top of my car.

Maybe, but it's a fatal error to assume everyone's as clued in as you
are. Some people are really, really stupid.
Look at Felix, for example....

and he lies to do it

It is *not* a lie that you are an idiot Felix. It is a *fact* that you
demonstrate to be true on a daily basis.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

alvey

2024-08-30 00:25:47 UTC

Post by Xeno

Post by Noddy
Perhaps he heard the sirens but not seen where the Ambulance was
coming from and wanted to be sure before he moved off?

Even if he was deaf, he had a green light, he could have moved off.
Not hard to work out where it was coming from though, the ambulance
was on my back bumper siren blasting, and its flashing lights must
have been visible in his rear view mirror over the top of my car.

Maybe, but it's a fatal error to assume everyone's as clued in as
you are. Some people are really, really stupid.
Look at Felix, for example....

See, there you go again! You can't help yourself. You have such a
huge inferiority complex that your only recourse is to try and bring
them down to your level. Sadly, for you, that is so low that you only
have the undersides of snakes for company!

and he lies to do it

It is *not* a lie that you are an idiot Felix. It is a *fact* that you
demonstrate to be true on a daily basis.

Sorry Chuck...

Trolling along in his Hulkstermobile
Hand down his pants and having a feel
He told a lie at every mile
So bad that they made us all smile
Cursin' and actin' a real Buffo
With no part of a brain anywhere on show

alvey
Opining that Fraudsters' trolling ability should be added to his list of
Fails.

Daryl

2024-08-29 11:26:06 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

--
Daryl

Peter Jason

2024-08-29 22:39:56 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 00:32:52 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

I think it was about the 1980's that we started to see ppl who
intervened to assist a victim have legal action taken against them, or
be charged with a crime, which caused ppl to think twice about being a
'good Samaritan'. nowadays it's even worse. many ppl, especially young
ppl, don't even think about helping. they just pull out their mobile,
and start filming. there's been occasions, as I recall, where ppl have
been attacked on buses or trains, and no one has helped. fortunately
tho, there are still ppl who do help. I wish we had the situation here
in Oz that exists in America where you can use lethal force if you fear
for your life, or your home is invaded. ppl should not have to think
twice about what they're legally allowed to do to defend themselves,
their family, or their property. it's just wrong!

--
Have a nice day!..

Sylvia Else

2024-08-30 03:32:31 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

The law in Australia clear enough - you can use lethal force to protect
yourself, or someone else, from death or serious bodily injury.
Generally speaking, the rule is that your action must be a reasonable
response to the situation as you see it. This latter point ensures that
killing someone who's pointing a gun at you is OK, even if it turns out
the gun was fake, or wasn't loaded.

Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.

I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to protect
oneself in Australia.

Sylvia

Daryl

2024-08-30 04:35:17 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

I think it was about the 1980's that we started to see ppl who
intervened to assist a victim have legal action taken against them, or
be charged with a crime, which caused ppl to think twice about being a
'good Samaritan'. nowadays it's even worse. many ppl, especially young
ppl, don't even think about helping. they just pull out their mobile,
and start filming. there's been occasions, as I recall, where ppl have
been attacked on buses or trains, and no one has helped. fortunately
tho, there are still ppl who do help. I wish we had the situation here
in Oz that exists in America where you can use lethal force if you
fear for your life, or your home is invaded. ppl should not have to
think twice about what they're legally allowed to do to defend
themselves, their family, or their property. it's just wrong!
--
Have a nice day!..

The law in Australia clear enough - you can use lethal force to protect
yourself, or someone else, from death or serious bodily injury.
Generally speaking, the rule is that your action must be a reasonable
response to the situation as you see it. This latter point ensures that
killing someone who's pointing a gun at you is OK, even if it turns out
the gun was fake, or wasn't loaded.
Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to protect
oneself in Australia.

There is also a law that I was taught when I did a first aid course that
says something like you can't be sued when something goes wrong if what
you did was with good intentions trying to help someone.

--
Daryl

Noddy

2024-08-30 05:05:58 UTC

Post by Sylvia Else
Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to
protect oneself in Australia.

Yep. We're not the 51st state of the USA. At least, not yet....

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Noddy

2024-08-30 05:04:41 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

I think it was about the 1980's that we started to see ppl who
intervened to assist a victim have legal action taken against them, or
be charged with a crime, which caused ppl to think twice about being a
'good Samaritan'. nowadays it's even worse. many ppl, especially young
ppl, don't even think about helping. they just pull out their mobile,
and start filming. there's been occasions, as I recall, where ppl have
been attacked on buses or trains, and no one has helped. fortunately
tho, there are still ppl who do help. I wish we had the situation here
in Oz that exists in America where you can use lethal force if you
fear for your life, or your home is invaded. ppl should not have to
think twice about what they're legally allowed to do to defend
themselves, their family, or their property. it's just wrong!
--
Have a nice day!..

The law in Australia clear enough - you can use lethal force to protect
yourself, or someone else, from death or serious bodily injury.
Generally speaking, the rule is that your action must be a reasonable
response to the situation as you see it. This latter point ensures that
killing someone who's pointing a gun at you is OK, even if it turns out
the gun was fake, or wasn't loaded.
Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to protect
oneself in Australia.

It's an invention of people looking for something to complain about for
the sake of it. Like Felix is doing above for example. You have *always*
had a legal right to defend yourself in this country as far as I'm
aware, and the limit of reasonable response as you've described is how
it's always been.

What Felix seems to be complaining about is that blowing someone's head
off with a shotgun because they walked onto your property and rang your
doorbell without permission isn't considered a reasonable response.

He's a wannabee American.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 06:35:58 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

I think it was about the 1980's that we started to see ppl who
intervened to assist a victim have legal action taken against them,
or be charged with a crime, which caused ppl to think twice about
being a 'good Samaritan'. nowadays it's even worse. many ppl,
especially young ppl, don't even think about helping. they just pull
out their mobile, and start filming. there's been occasions, as I
recall, where ppl have been attacked on buses or trains, and no one
has helped. fortunately tho, there are still ppl who do help. I wish
we had the situation here in Oz that exists in America where you can
use lethal force if you fear for your life, or your home is invaded.
ppl should not have to think twice about what they're legally allowed
to do to defend themselves, their family, or their property. it's
just wrong!
--
Have a nice day!..

The law in Australia clear enough - you can use lethal force to
protect yourself, or someone else, from death or serious bodily
injury. Generally speaking, the rule is that your action must be a
reasonable response to the situation as you see it. This latter point
ensures that killing someone who's pointing a gun at you is OK, even
if it turns out the gun was fake, or wasn't loaded.
Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to
protect oneself in Australia.

that problem is the proviso that your action must be reasonable. if you
kill someone, and the Police or courts determine that your action was
not reasonable, then you're in trouble. the advantage of the American
model is that you have cart blanche to defend yourself.

Post by Sylvia Else
Sylvia

--
Have a nice day!..

Noddy

2024-08-30 09:35:13 UTC

Post by Sylvia Else
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to
protect oneself in Australia.

Which probably has a hell of a lot to do with why the US has on average
around 35 thousand gunshot related deaths every year....

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Sylvia Else

2024-08-30 11:00:17 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

I think it was about the 1980's that we started to see ppl who
intervened to assist a victim have legal action taken against them,
or be charged with a crime, which caused ppl to think twice about
being a 'good Samaritan'. nowadays it's even worse. many ppl,
especially young ppl, don't even think about helping. they just pull
out their mobile, and start filming. there's been occasions, as I
recall, where ppl have been attacked on buses or trains, and no one
has helped. fortunately tho, there are still ppl who do help. I wish
we had the situation here in Oz that exists in America where you can
use lethal force if you fear for your life, or your home is invaded.
ppl should not have to think twice about what they're legally allowed
to do to defend themselves, their family, or their property. it's
just wrong!
--
Have a nice day!..

The law in Australia clear enough - you can use lethal force to
protect yourself, or someone else, from death or serious bodily
injury. Generally speaking, the rule is that your action must be a
reasonable response to the situation as you see it. This latter point
ensures that killing someone who's pointing a gun at you is OK, even
if it turns out the gun was fake, or wasn't loaded.
Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to
protect oneself in Australia.

Post by Sylvia Else
Sylvia

We don't see many cases before the courts, which probably means that
whether something is reasonable is pretty clear to all concerned.

Some people believe that "reasonable" means something akin to
"proportionate" (can't use a gun to defend against a knife, for
example), but it doesn't.

I am bothered that the law takes no account of the fact that the person
doing the defending was usually not on notice that they were going to be
attacked, and that their thinking will have been clouded by an
adrenaline rush that was not of their own making. It is too easy for the
prosecution and courts to second guess such people from the comfort and
safety of their respective armchairs.

Sylvia.

Rod Speed

2024-09-05 22:44:21 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

I think it was about the 1980's that we started to see ppl who
intervened to assist a victim have legal action taken against them,
or be charged with a crime, which caused ppl to think twice about
being a 'good Samaritan'. nowadays it's even worse. many ppl,
especially young ppl, don't even think about helping. they just pull
out their mobile, and start filming. there's been occasions, as I
recall, where ppl have been attacked on buses or trains, and no one
has helped. fortunately tho, there are still ppl who do help. I wish
we had the situation here in Oz that exists in America where you can
use lethal force if you fear for your life, or your home is invaded.
ppl should not have to think twice about what they're legally allowed
to do to defend themselves, their family, or their property. it's
just wrong!
-- Have a nice day!..

The law in Australia clear enough - you can use lethal force to
protect yourself, or someone else, from death or serious bodily
injury. Generally speaking, the rule is that your action must be a
reasonable response to the situation as you see it. This latter point
ensures that killing someone who's pointing a gun at you is OK, even
if it turns out the gun was fake, or wasn't loaded.
Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to
protect oneself in Australia.

that problem is the proviso that your action must be reasonable. if
you kill someone, and the Police or courts determine that your action
was not reasonable, then you're in trouble. the advantage of the
American model is that you have cart blanche to defend yourself.

We don't see many cases before the courts, which probably means that
whether something is reasonable is pretty clear to all concerned.

Its much more likely that the reason we don't see very
many before the courts is because the victim usually ends
up dead, particularly in domestic violence situations.

Post by Sylvia Else
Some people believe that "reasonable" means something akin to
"proportionate" (can't use a gun to defend against a knife, for
example), but it doesn't.
I am bothered that the law takes no account of the fact that the person
doing the defending was usually not on notice that they were going to be
attacked, and that their thinking will have been clouded by an
adrenaline rush that was not of their own making. It is too easy for the
prosecution and courts to second guess such people from the comfort and
safety of their respective armchairs.

Keithr0

2024-08-30 23:54:22 UTC

For some inexplicable reason some people just freeze up when there is
some sort of emergency, their brain doesn't seem to understand that they
need to do something.

They're afraid of the lawyers, and the intrusive media.

I think it was about the 1980's that we started to see ppl who
intervened to assist a victim have legal action taken against them,
or be charged with a crime, which caused ppl to think twice about
being a 'good Samaritan'. nowadays it's even worse. many ppl,
especially young ppl, don't even think about helping. they just pull
out their mobile, and start filming. there's been occasions, as I
recall, where ppl have been attacked on buses or trains, and no one
has helped. fortunately tho, there are still ppl who do help. I wish
we had the situation here in Oz that exists in America where you can
use lethal force if you fear for your life, or your home is invaded.
ppl should not have to think twice about what they're legally allowed
to do to defend themselves, their family, or their property. it's
just wrong!
--
Have a nice day!..

The law in Australia clear enough - you can use lethal force to
protect yourself, or someone else, from death or serious bodily
injury. Generally speaking, the rule is that your action must be a
reasonable response to the situation as you see it. This latter point
ensures that killing someone who's pointing a gun at you is OK, even
if it turns out the gun was fake, or wasn't loaded.
Since it falls within a state jurisdiction, the exact wording of the
defence varies.
I don't know the origin of this idea that one is not allowed to
protect oneself in Australia.

Here's a commentary on those American laws.

Keithr0

2024-08-30 07:46:54 UTC

How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here. If
you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start a
similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without dragging
them in from places like aus.legal.

Xeno

2024-08-30 09:28:39 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here. If
you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start a
similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without dragging
them in from places like aus.legal.

What up Keith? Don't like the competition?

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 09:38:53 UTC

Post by Xeno

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

What up Keith? Don't like the competition?

--
Have a nice day!..

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 09:34:39 UTC

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other people,
and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must be a bad day
for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that even though this is
an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can post whatever they wish, in
any manner they wish, nevertheless you have total control over it, and
can dictate what others must do, as you have been so well taught by your
mentor noddy.

Have a nice day!..

Keithr0

2024-08-30 11:01:21 UTC

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 11:48:42 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other
people, and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must be
a bad day for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that even
though this is an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can post
whatever they wish, in any manner they wish, nevertheless you have
total control over it, and can dictate what others must do, as you
have been so well taught by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

what victim. I'm just telling you to rack off and myob. you get no say
in what I do.

--
Have a nice day!..

alvey

2024-08-30 20:39:35 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other
people, and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must be
a bad day for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that even
though this is an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can post
whatever they wish, in any manner they wish, nevertheless you have
total control over it, and can dictate what others must do, as you
have been so well taught by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

what victim.

Yep, he's making even less sense with that than the usual collection of
DATE cliches. They're like a Trump mob chanting, "Drain the swamp!",
"Make America Great Again", etc.

alvey

Keithr0

2024-08-30 23:45:26 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other
people, and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must be
a bad day for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that even
though this is an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can post
whatever they wish, in any manner they wish, nevertheless you have
total control over it, and can dictate what others must do, as you
have been so well taught by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

what victim. I'm just telling you to rack off and myob. you get no say
in what I do.

Well just stop replying to my posts and stop fucking crossposting. In
Usenet, crossposters are regarded as scum.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-31 00:11:00 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it across
and start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here
without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other
people, and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must
be a bad day for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that
even though this is an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can
post whatever they wish, in any manner they wish, nevertheless you
have total control over it, and can dictate what others must do, as
you have been so well taught by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

what victim. I'm just telling you to rack off and myob. you get no
say in what I do.

Well just stop replying to my posts and stop fucking crossposting. In
Usenet, crossposters are regarded as scum.

why are you so concerned? or did you just want another excuse to
criticise me? in case you haven't noticed usenet is almost dead. there's
only a few ppl posting in each group. buy crossposting we can get
together to discuss something of mutual interest.

--
Have a nice day!..

Clocky

2024-08-31 00:13:24 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and
start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other
people, and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must be
a bad day for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that even
though this is an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can post
whatever they wish, in any manner they wish, nevertheless you have
total control over it, and can dictate what others must do, as you
have been so well taught by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

what victim. I'm just telling you to rack off and myob. you get no say
in what I do.

Well just stop replying to my posts and stop fucking crossposting. In
Usenet, crossposters are regarded as scum.

In Usenet and in the real world, frauds are regarded as scum - yet
you're happy enabling one.

What does that say about you, scumbag?

--
In thread "May need to buy petrol soon" Sept 23 2021 11:15:59am
Keithr0 wrote: "He made the assertion either he proves it or he is a
proven liar."

On Sept 23 2021 3:16:29pm Keithr0 wrote:
"He asserts that the claim is true, so, if it is unproven, he is lying."

Keithr0

2024-08-31 01:51:57 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it across
and start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here
without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other
people, and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must
be a bad day for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that
even though this is an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can
post whatever they wish, in any manner they wish, nevertheless you
have total control over it, and can dictate what others must do, as
you have been so well taught by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

what victim. I'm just telling you to rack off and myob. you get no
say in what I do.

Well just stop replying to my posts and stop fucking crossposting. In
Usenet, crossposters are regarded as scum.

In Usenet and in the real world, frauds are regarded as scum - yet
you're happy enabling one.
What does that say about you, scumbag?

Once again the feral child rides in to rescue his little chum. How sweet.

Noddy

2024-08-30 14:30:37 UTC

Post by Mighty Mouse
I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other people,
and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must be a bad day
for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that even though this is
an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can post whatever they wish,
in any manner they wish, nevertheless you have total control over it,
and can dictate what others must do, as you have been so well taught
by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

I'll give you this , you play the victim very nicely.

He has *stacks* of experience.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

alvey

2024-08-30 20:31:04 UTC

He clearly hasn't thought this through, which is surprising given his
massive intelligence. He should be positively welcoming any new faces.
They'd be more ppl to tell that he worked in Merica...

alvey

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 23:44:17 UTC

Post by alvey

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

I'm sorry Keith. I keep forgetting you're so superior to other
people, and don't want to be bothered by inferior humans. it must be
a bad day for me, because I'm also failing to remember, that even
though this is an unmoderated public forum, and anyone can post
whatever they wish, in any manner they wish, nevertheless you have
total control over it, and can dictate what others must do, as you
have been so well taught by your mentor noddy.
Have a nice day!..

He clearly hasn't thought this through, which is surprising given his
massive intelligence. He should be positively welcoming any new faces.
They'd be more ppl to tell that he worked in Merica...

LOL

Post by alvey
alvey

--
Have a nice day!..

Noddy

2024-08-30 09:36:37 UTC

I didn't even notice it this time around. Fuck it. It's time to block
this retard.

--
--
--
Regards,
Noddy.

Xeno

2024-08-30 12:11:12 UTC

I didn't even notice it this time around. Fuck it. It's time to block
this retard.

No point *you* doing the blocking! You know full well your killfile
blocks as well as a fishing net blocks *water*.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Clocky

2024-08-30 12:25:56 UTC

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 12:40:34 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

--
Have a nice day!..

Xeno

2024-08-30 12:41:48 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Especially so when *he joined* the existing loonies in here.

--
Xeno

Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)

Keithr0

2024-08-30 23:42:30 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and start
a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 23:50:48 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and
start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

--
Have a nice day!..

Keithr0

2024-08-31 01:50:42 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from here.
If you really must put it in another group, copy it across and
start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here without
dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-31 04:10:54 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it across
and start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here
without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

I do. but you don't obviously. which is surprising since it's British in
origin

twat
/twat,twɒt/
noun
vulgar slang
noun: twat; plural noun: twats

    1.
    British
    a stupid or obnoxious person.
    2.
    a woman's genitals.

--
Have a nice day!..

Keithr0

2024-08-31 07:16:07 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it across
and start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here
without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

I do. but you don't obviously. which is surprising since it's British in
origin
twat
/twat,twɒt/
noun
vulgar slang
noun: twat; plural noun: twats
    1.
    British
    a stupid or obnoxious person.
    2.
    a woman's genitals.

In fact it's old English dating back to the 15th century at least.
Personally, I don't see it as an insult as, over the years, I've had a
great deal of pleasure from such things. Your mileage may vary.

Clocky

2024-08-31 07:18:35 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it across
and start a similar thread there. There are enough loonies here
without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

I do. but you don't obviously. which is surprising since it's British
in origin
twat
/twat,twɒt/
noun
vulgar slang
noun: twat; plural noun: twats
     1.
     British
     a stupid or obnoxious person.
     2.
     a woman's genitals.

You've had great pleasure from being stupid and called a twat? Ok,
whatever floats your boat I guess.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-31 09:11:42 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it
across and start a similar thread there. There are enough
loonies here without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

I do. but you don't obviously. which is surprising since it's
British in origin
twat
/twat,twɒt/
noun
vulgar slang
noun: twat; plural noun: twats
     1.
     British
     a stupid or obnoxious person.
     2.
     a woman's genitals.

In fact it's old English dating back to the 15th century at least.
Personally, I don't see it as an insult as, over the years, I've had
a great deal of pleasure from such things. Your mileage may vary.

You've had great pleasure from being stupid and called a twat? Ok,
whatever floats your boat I guess.

obviously he's referring to definition 2. so now he's boasting about his
sexual exploits, along with the other stuff, ie. working for NASA,
software development, etc., but since he's been married to the same
woman for 50 years (allegedly) if there's been other than conjugal
activity, he's been a very naughty boy!

--
Have a nice day!..

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-31 09:12:57 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it
across and start a similar thread there. There are enough
loonies here without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

I do. but you don't obviously. which is surprising since it's British
in origin
twat
/twat,twɒt/
noun
vulgar slang
noun: twat; plural noun: twats
     1.
     British
     a stupid or obnoxious person.
     2.
     a woman's genitals.

it's rather difficult not to derive pleasure from twats, I would suggest..

--
Have a nice day!..

Clocky

2024-09-02 03:18:05 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it
across and start a similar thread there. There are enough
loonies here without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

I do. but you don't obviously. which is surprising since it's British
in origin
twat
/twat,twɒt/
noun
vulgar slang
noun: twat; plural noun: twats
     1.
     British
     a stupid or obnoxious person.
     2.
     a woman's genitals.

it's rather difficult not to derive pleasure from twats, I would suggest..

But could any twats derive pleasure from Sliemey?

Mighty Mouse

2024-09-02 00:36:09 UTC

Post by Keithr0
How many times do you have to be told, do not cross-post from
here. If you really must put it in another group, copy it
across and start a similar thread there. There are enough
loonies here without dragging them in from places like aus.legal.

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

exactly. what a pretentious twat he is.

Bet you wouldn't recognise a twat if you saw one.

I recognized you

I don't think you know the meaning of the word.

I do. but you don't obviously. which is surprising since it's
British in origin
twat
/twat,twɒt/
noun
vulgar slang
noun: twat; plural noun: twats
     1.
     British
     a stupid or obnoxious person.
     2.
     a woman's genitals.

In fact it's old English dating back to the 15th century at least.
Personally, I don't see it as an insult as, over the years, I've had
a great deal of pleasure from such things. Your mileage may vary.

it's rather difficult not to derive pleasure from twats, I would suggest..

But could any twats derive pleasure from Sliemey?

yes, well... :)

meanwhile, have a laugh..

Loading Image...

--
Have a nice day!..

Keithr0

2024-08-30 23:43:17 UTC

Get off your high horse you fucking pillock.

Ah, the feral child rides to the rescue of his little friend.

Sylvia Else

2024-08-30 03:35:34 UTC

Sometimes I'm faced the situation where I can hear the sirens, but are
unable to tell which direction they're coming from, which can make it
difficult to know what action to take. The sirens themselves don't help
- a constantly varying pitch messes up part of the hearing mechanism
that allows one to discern the direction.

So, people may not be freezing, just trying to figure out what they
should do.

Sylvia.

Mighty Mouse

2024-08-30 06:38:04 UTC

Post by Keithr0
Traveling home this arvo, the road is a 2 lane two way road except at
a set of traffic lights. For a couple of hundred metres each side a
left land is added making a 4 lane dual highway. The lights go red,
in front is a high top van which pulls into the left lane and a car
in front of me in the right lane as am I. The lights go green, but at
that moment an ambulance arrives lights flashing and siren going
behind me.
All that has to happen is for the van to stay where he is, the car in
front to pull forward and into the left lane with room for me to follow.
What happens is that the van does the right thing and stays where he
is, but the car in front just sits there transfixed. I'm boxed in
with nowhere to go. Eventually, with some encouragement, he does move
forward and over, and I can get out of the way. What a bloody idiot,
even without the ambulance, he had a green light but he just sat there.

Sometimes I'm faced the situation where I can hear the sirens, but are
unable to tell which direction they're coming from, which can make it
difficult to know what action to take. The sirens themselves don't
help - a constantly varying pitch messes up part of the hearing
mechanism that allows one to discern the direction.
So, people may not be freezing, just trying to figure out what they
should do.

yes. and we've probably all been in that situation. I know I have.

Post by Sylvia Else
Sylvia.

--
Have a nice day!..

Keithr0

2024-08-30 07:42:37 UTC

Post by Keithr0
Traveling home this arvo, the road is a 2 lane two way road except at
a set of traffic lights. For a couple of hundred metres each side a
left land is added making a 4 lane dual highway. The lights go red, in
front is a high top van which pulls into the left lane and a car in
front of me in the right lane as am I. The lights go green, but at
that moment an ambulance arrives lights flashing and siren going
behind me.
All that has to happen is for the van to stay where he is, the car in
front to pull forward and into the left lane with room for me to follow.
What happens is that the van does the right thing and stays where he
is, but the car in front just sits there transfixed. I'm boxed in with
nowhere to go. Eventually, with some encouragement, he does move
forward and over, and I can get out of the way. What a bloody idiot,
even without the ambulance, he had a green light but he just sat there.

Sometimes I'm faced the situation where I can hear the sirens, but are
unable to tell which direction they're coming from, which can make it
difficult to know what action to take. The sirens themselves don't help
- a constantly varying pitch messes up part of the hearing mechanism
that allows one to discern the direction.
So, people may not be freezing, just trying to figure out what they
should do.
Sylvia.

The siren was one car length behind the idiot, if you can't work out the
direction at that distance, you are basically a menace on the road.

Daryl

2024-08-30 12:06:49 UTC