Post by Mighty MousePost by Mighty MouseWhere is there an index of the year's fatality count? Surely
the cops
must have one and it would make interesting reading? Car
model/drunk-sober/drugs/terrain/sex/speed/day/night/wet/dry/
ethnicity/windy/
and even IQ?
The cops would have most of that data. One item of data
collection might be somewhat fraught: IQ, difficult to collect
such data from dead people. Really, the victims do need a
functioning brain in order to permit their IQ data to be
gathered and assessed.
For that matter, how many *living* people have ever had an IQ
test? And, no, those stupid little online IQ tests don't
count. Given that one's IQ changes over time, what relevance
would a 20 or 30 year out of date IQ test have? IQ is
generally thought to have peaked between ages 20-25.
Thereafter IQ has a steady decline until age 70 whereupon the
decline becomes more rapid. My last IQ test was done in *1978*
during psychometric testing at an age where IQ is generally
thought to have peaked - and it was the real deal, a
requirement for overseas work. Would those results be relevant
now? Likely not.
you're correct about IQ. fyi I used to administer IQ tests. IQ,
and mental ability in general, deteriorates significantly
during ones lifetime. no one is exempt!
What I thought humorous was the thought of getting victims of
fatal accidents to do an IQ test. Though he survived, Darren
should have been made to do an IQ test after he headbutted those
vehicles (according to his claim) on two separate occasions.
Guaranteed to be a sub-par result, especially in the light of
his subsequent activities!
( Elon Musk is 160, and Einstein was too. Bill Gates about the same.
We had to do a battery of IQ tests at tech college. The
interesting result was that IQ appeared to be the inverse of
success in the exams.
pity the guy that shot Trump wasn't aiming at Gates, and didn't
miss. it would have been just payback for the abomination called
windows we have suffered with for decades. :)
What a lovely fellow you are, Gates is one of the worlds major
philanthropic donors. Nobody forced you to use Windows. Maybe your
problems were due to your own incompetence.
You have to wonder what sort of person "suffers for decades"
everyone who has used windows.
So you're speaking for all Windows users? The vast majority have had
few if any problems.
it's taken them three decades to get all (most of?) the bugs out. it
wasn't until XP that windows became reasonably stable. before that
freezing, shut down issues, bsods, hardware issues, etc., etc., were
ubiquitous. OS/2 ran each program in it's own memory slot (for
example) so a program crash didn't crash the OS
and let's not forget the endemic windows issue that has never been fixed
and never will be.. it gets slower and slower and more clogged up over
time. none of the windows 'clean up' programs can fix it either. the
computer illiterate think their computer is 'worn out' or 'dying' or
'too old' and such, so they go and buy a new one, when the reality is
there's nothing wrong with it except that it's running windows!
What a cunning marketing plan!
For the record, even Mac OS suffers from that issue - to a degree.
It even gets more interesting with the Mac file system. Apple brought
out a new file system called APFS which handles SSD drives better than
the previous HFS+. APFS became the default format for Mac computers from
then on. Bad move because, over time, the APFS file system on a platter
drive began to bog down as data and programs were added - really badly
bogged down too. I ended up putting a 1TB SSD drive in that computer, a
2014 i5 Mac Mini with 8 Gig of RAM, and, as expected, it now runs really
fast on the APFS file system. My other current Mac Mini, a 2014 i7 with
16 Gig of RAM, has a fusion drive - a combo of 1TB platter drive and a
128 Gig SSD running APFS - and it has yet to bog down. I don't expect it to.
If I recall correctly, three big issues with slowdown in Windows
computers. The two issues most easily dealt with were fragmented drive
platters and clogged up registries. The fragmented platter issue should
have gone away with SSD drives and there are plenty of programs out
there to clean up the registry entries. The third issue was, and
remains, malware. And it's not just the malware that gets in to the
system surreptitiously - it's the other kind that wittingly or
unwittingly gets installed by the user. Like those little *helper apps*
that get installed, by default usually, when a program is installed.
They are the reason I never used to do *default installs*. A lot of them
seem to be TSRs that just eat up CPU cycles. The worst I saw was a
computer that took a whole 5 minutes to respond to a mouse click.
Between the virii and the "helper apps", there were insufficient CPU
cycles to deal with the demand.
Post by Mighty MousePost by Mighty MouseMore often than not, any problems have been due to drivers supplied
by third party companies.
and until recently windows didn't deal with that by certifying them
with a software product when there are many alternatives.
I've been using a Mac mini for about 8yrs and I've almost forgotten
how to use a Windows computer.
--
Xeno
Nothing astonishes Noddy so much as common sense and plain dealing.
(with apologies to Ralph Waldo Emerson)